Posted on 08/29/2014 9:29:35 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Among the more nauseating spectacles of the Rotherham child rape scandal has been the squirming evasion and shameless attempts at face-saving by the various authority figures whose job it supposedly was to prevent such horrors happening.
One of them is a man named Javed Khan. He is the head of Britain's largest children's charity Barnardo's which now stands accused of having known about the Muslim rape gang problem for well over a decade - but which chose to do next to nothing to confront it.
In an ugly interview with Sky News, Khan infuriated viewers - and his normally mild-mannered interviewer Eamonn Holmes - with his mealy-mouthed evasiveness.
Not only did Khan refuse to call for the resignation of South Yorkshire Police Commissioner (and former head of Rotherham Council Children's Services) Shaun Wright but it often seemed as though he was trying to make excuses for the various institutions which allowed mass child rape to occur on their watch.
Holmes could barely contain his fury.
"You're the expert in the field. You're the man who people turn to when all else fails. Your charity's job is to protect children, to protect the innocence of those children. I put it to you, Mr Khan, no one else has bothered: are you going to fail them as well?"Khan once again evaded the question. As well he might - for the children's charity he represents is almost as heavily compromised by this scandal as Rotherham Council and South Yorkshire Police.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
This is what happens in countries with gun control... You have to depend on justice from crooked politicians and policemen who have their own agendas.
Almost any group could satisfy that definition of “religion”, as long as “superhuman agency” could be the universe itself, fate, the laws of nature, etc.
Whether Islam is or isn’t a religion, it is also much more than a religion. It is also a cult (at all times) and an enemy of the US Constitution (by extremists or by all adherents when they become 10% of the population).
While our laws and Constitution allow freedom of religion, they do not allow the crimes used by cults and/or treason.
At http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3198476/posts?page=32#32 I suggested that Islam be considered a religion until its adherents approach 8% of the population, at which time it would be considered an enemy of the US Constitution because of its own requirements that its adherents become enemies of the US Constitution when they reach 10% of the population. Therefore, the policy should be that the nation will monitor the number of Muslims in the country to make sure that they never reach 8% or higher - thus allowing them to remain a religion not bound to commit treason against the US and our Constitution.
More than that. He is a militant muslim.
I don't know how anyone can live in England and NOT be a UKIP supporter after this.
bump
He IS a screaming racist, right or not. And a holocaust denier. The BNP are a racist party and despite a public pro-Israel stance, have many anti-Semites in their ranks. They don’t like blacks, gays, Catholics, anyone of colour (and that includes those serving in the armed forces past and present, like the Gurkhas or Johnson Beharry VC). They have links to football hooligans and neo-Nazi groups in the UK.
He may have been right on this issue, but then even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
Support Britain?. Support UKIP and a stronger Tory party. NOT the BNP.
Rape-aXe
No, not every town. As many English and British towns don’t have Muslims, some don’t have any ethnic populations. Contrary to myth, there are many parts of the UK where you wont see a Muslim community or even individuals.
They are a major part of some towns and cities, not in others.
Yeah, like the activist woman who went to Haiti to “help” and got raped. Then blamed her experience on whitey at her blog site. Useless people like that will never wake up.
Since I'm not a Brit, this is moral support only.;-)
What’s the talk on the street about the Rotherham rapes?
I got the feeling that rape was partially consensual.
That’s their strategy. It’s the same here. If they can mass in a certain location they can take over that area, push for societal/legal concessions, and use those precedents to impact the whole nation.
Sort of like Ferguson, MO. They can create a slum, from that create a crisis, and use that crisis to push an agenda onto the whole rest of this very large county that doesn’t have any of the issues that Ferguson, MO has. And that’s what is being pushed for right now. They want to use Ferguson as the reason to train ALL of US law enforcement to be “politically correct” just like this system that overlooked massive crimes rather than be called “racist”.
It’s sort of like a beach-head. They establish power in one spot and then they invade the rest of the country from there - physically and/or through legal/social precedent. Those who live in the places where there aren’t the problems will be just as subject to the “PC solutions” as everybody else; that’s the point of creating the places and crises in the first place. And unless those who live away from the crisis/beachhead recognize the strategy they will not fight the beast until it’s firmly entrenched in their own community.
Should have been:
“Sort of like Ferguson, MO. They can create a slum, from that create a crisis, and use that crisis to push an agenda onto the whole rest of this very large COUNTRY - even the part that doesn’t have any of the issues that Ferguson, MO has”
I agree.
It is also a cult (at all times)
The most accurate definition of "a cult" being an unpopular religion.
The term actually had technical definitions till a few decades ago when it began to be used by "traditional religious leaders" to stigmatize new and "weird" religions.
By that definition, of course, the early Christians were "a cult." In Oz, till recently, Seventh Day Adventists were considered a cult, probably one that ritualistically killed children.
Of all the things I can think of as a bad idea, putting some government agency of deciding what religious beliefs are acceptable, and which are "a cult" or "not a religion" is very near the head of the list.
Look at it this way. There are a good many people who believe any disagreement with the gay agenda is "hate," and that any religion that teaches hate isn't "a real religion." Do you want a government agency to have the power to make that determination and use government authority to crush "hate religions?"
I suspect it's not very PC. A lot of the UK articles I've seen on the subject have Closed Comments.
Wonder why?
His organization was uniquely positioned to know the identities of very vulnerable girls. Some digging might uncover a nest of snakes (which is why digging will be studiously avoided).
Be clear.
These “gangs” are militants.
Rape is a tactic of political domination for muslims.
These rapes are so systematic and pervasive that they must be conscious policy, planned by the Pakistanis in a deliberate effort to create a new race or to dilute British nationalism
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_Bangladesh_Liberation_War
because in PC-land these newspaper websites can get in trouble for comments on their page that offends muslims and stuff.
I don’t want to get too side-tracked on the Ferguson issue, but I think we do need to learn the strategies so we know how to confront them, to keep the same kind of thing from happening here.
Ferguson had to be turned into a federal issue in order for that “crisis” to “not go to waste”. The FBI had to be involved and there had to be demonstrations outside of Ferguson, or else the issue would have been dealt with at the local level without spreading out to the whole country.
Eric Holder’s role was to make sure that he has an excuse to punish the whole country for what he and the race-grievance pimps had to push as a racist action by a local cop.
Ronald Reagan is reported as having said that the scariest 9 words in the English language are “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
The communist/Islamist alliance that has captured the US White House used the same techniques as both wings of that alliance. They will take a “crisis” and use it as the excuse to “fix” the whole country - with “fixing” meaning whatever helps their people/cause and hurts everybody else.
Because this Kahn guy is supposed to be watching over all of the UK, I suspect that there are a LOT more places where the same thing is happening, and he is the “cover” to make sure that the policies/procedures of political correctness spread to the whole country and didn’t simply remain in this one locality. He is the “Eric Holder” for the Muslim rape gangs in the UK.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.