Posted on 08/28/2014 11:36:10 AM PDT by GonzoII
Perfect storms don't come much more perfect than the Rotherham child-abuse revelations currently rocking the U.K. Everything modern Britain is famous for fretting overfrom class to race, pedophiles to official incompetenceis implicated in this sordid story of abuse in and around a northern English town once known for producing steel.All eyes have been on Rotherham since a report into child sexual abuse there was published on Tuesday. Commissioned by Rotherham Borough Council and wrote by Professor Alexis Jay, the report makes grim reading. It says that from 1997 to 2013, 1,400 children and teenagers were subjected to "appalling abuse" by gangs of older men. Some of the victims, the vast majority girls, were trafficked around Britain to be sexually abused. Some were beaten, some raped.
The report says a key reason the abuse went on for so long is because of the "collective failures" of the local authorities, including police. Despite being presented with what Ms. Jay calls stark evidence that abuse was taking place, the Rotherham authorities underplayed the seriousness of the problem. The institutions charged by modern society with protecting the vulnerable from the malevolent through their inaction allowed the abuse to continue.
It took the press, one of the most maligned institutions in Britain, to do the thing that they're so often criticized for doingdigging dirtfor the Rotherham abuse to become a national story. Dogged reporters at the Times of London, owned by the same company as this newspaper, played a central role in exposing child abuse in towns like Rotherham and forcing an investigation.
Why were officials so unwilling to poke their noses where they most certainly did belong? Because of the race and class of the perpetrators and victims, according to the Jay report. The vast majority of the abusers were of Pakistani...
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Well, OK, it's one thing we DO have. My mistake.
Couple this with the fact ISIS enjoys widespread support among UK muzzies. They have a big problem. Are they finally waking up to it?
what a terribly sad story - so many injured young
OK ,UK ,think about it , No more Beer and No more Bacon Sandwiches
ISLAM.
Muhammed was a child rapist. So what’s the problem?
Whatever, this is a failure of administration. I live in a city about the same size as Rotherham. I cannot imagine 10 children being abused like this without the law coming down very hard on the perps. 1400 is beyond imagination.
Save
So mohammed was a pedophile, rapist and adulterer. Got it.
He was the World's first Democrat.
It dosent.
What it does have is an attraction to young impressionable British male muslims.
And that’s just the half of it. He started out raiding caravans along the trade routes of ancient Arabia. He murdered people. He organized sixty seven military campaigns in his lifetime, twenty seven of them he led personally. This is who Osama bin Laden was inspired by as are all Muslim males. Mohammed was the ‘’prefect man’’ to the muzzies.
The perps are Pakistani males.
What nationality are the girl victims?
Are the girls Muslim, too?
Are the pedophile and daughter-in-law stories in the Koran?
If not, do rank and file Muslims accept those stories as true, or do they reject the historical sources of those stories?
When some of these perps went to trial, the UK news article stated that the girls were lower-class and Caucasian, but not Muslim.
The photo that accompanied the article showed about a half dozen men. Most appeared Middle Eastern, and one or two were black.
But the UK news media continues to refer to them as "Asian". Because; to tell the truth would be racist.
Yes. And so is his ‘’finding’’ his six-year child bride, Ayisha who he raped when she was nine. Mohammed, to put it bluntly was a m’fer of the worst sort.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.