Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Open source, in this case, means it’s subject to interpretation. This is NOT something in which the government should be invested in any way, shape or form. This is really bad juju.


2 posted on 08/26/2014 9:43:59 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia

Sounds like the taxpayers are funding the lefty version of TWITCHY.


15 posted on 08/26/2014 9:50:10 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: rarestia
Definitely "extra-constitutional," and it doesn't send chills down my spine; instead it gets my Eire up.

It could be argued "government" has a compelling state interest in monitoring web traffic for criminal behavior but "hate" is not a crime, merely a motive and a hard sell as an add-on to felonies and requiring additional jail time and fines.

This kind of decision falls squarely into the frame of reference - a irreconcilably flawed frame of reference - your Old New Left cultural marxist beings to the policy decision-making table. It descends from the idea that government arbitrates society, an upside-down notion dragging a lot of well-meaning but silly people along with their hard-Left false shepherds.

This is what happens when people who equate "celebrity" with "credibility" elect certain people to office.

Right out of your Bible, "justice comes out perverted."

27 posted on 08/26/2014 9:57:49 AM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson