Again, you are being asked to defend your “CURE.”
Hint: Jesus would rebuke you.
The basic concept is sedition. But more philosophically, are you arguing that there are no limits to free speech? Or are you arguing that words can do no harm? Because if you admit words can harm, then the foundation for what I am saying stands, given that the harm is properly met by what you call my "cure." So what is the proper response, the proper "cure," for calmly, openly, methodically planned genocide? To wait until millions are dead? Remember, the issue here is not arguing over the possibility of a mysterious side-effect. These so-called medical theorists want to withhold medical care from millions of people simply because they deem them unworthy of it - literally dehumanize them by law.
That, to me, is Hitler. It's Mao. It's Stalin. it's Pol Pot. Pick your mass-murdering tyrant. And you are telling me that if these murderers and their cronies were stopped at the planning stage, if people didn't wait till the horror of WWII ended to string up Mussolini & Co., that Jesus would rebuke those who intervened? Really?
Then let me quote the actual Jesus to you, and correct your fantasy of Him. Jesus said, "Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division; for from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law." (Luke 12:49–53)
THAT Jesus would rebuke me? I think not - I think He would rebuke you. When millions are dead, I think He would say to you, "Why did you let this happen? Why didn't you speak up? You saw how they were going to kill everyone. They didn't hide it. They said they would judge who would deserve life, and who would be stripped of their humanity. They claimed the powers of godhood in order to commit mass murder, and you called it non-violent free speech. They wore white doctor's coats, and you abandoned your common sense. They spoke of monstrous genocide, and because they kept their voices calm, you claimed they were reasonable and turned your back on your own spiritual duty. Now your country is decimated with dead and dying, their murderous laws are in place, and you pray for relief? Did God not give you a brain and heart and grace to stand up for the truth protect life? Why didn't you use it!?"
That's the Jesus I know. YMMV.
But I'll tell you one thing, this isn't theory. This article is current, and Obamacare is the law. And no, we can't go around trying to string people up. But we damn sure can speak possibly about the seriousness of the crimes being committed. And yes, I believe that a just country would convict people planning - planning - dehumanization in order to support the deprivation of medical care, of attempted genocide, and sentence them to death.
And in response, I believe Jesus would extend His blessing and protection and say, "well done."
No, Jesus would not extend a “well done” to an “execution for illegal speech” squad. You are just pleasuring yourself.
Think for a change. Who’s going to constitute this squad? How will it remain free of corruption? Given that the more power it has, the more corruption possible?
The old fashioned answer, that the people at large are responsible for trusting God individually and thus refusing lies, is the only correct one.