Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama May Seek New Funds To Battle Islamic State: Senate Aide [No Clear Plan?]
Yahoo News ^ | August 22, 2014 | Richard Cowan

Posted on 08/22/2014 7:31:55 PM PDT by Steelfish

Obama May Seek New Funds To Battle Islamic State: Senate Aide By Richard Cowan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama could ask the U.S. Congress in coming weeks to approve new funds for airstrikes against Islamic State targets, according to a congressional aide, following the militants' beheading of an American journalist and activities in Iraq.

A Senate Democratic aide on Friday said the Obama administration could detail by early to mid-September the amount of additional money it wants for the military operations, although the aide did not estimate the size of the possible funding request.

The administration has indicated it does not want to put combat troops into the region, although it has said it is evaluating all options on how to deal with Syria.

The request would come as some influential members of Congress call on Obama to step up U.S. military pressure against Islamic State fighters. On Thursday, Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona called for a significant increase in air strikes, including bombing missions against targets in Syria.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: isis; jayvee
This is a half-hearted attempt with no clear purpose in mind.
1 posted on 08/22/2014 7:31:55 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Can’t he just use his peace prize cash?


2 posted on 08/22/2014 7:32:52 PM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Read the headline wrong, thought it said that Obama is looking for new ways to FUND ISIS..after all, Obama is ISIS’s number one fan


3 posted on 08/22/2014 7:34:03 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The Clinton-Obama Benghazi Rule is as follows:

“1.) ALWAYS STAND DOWN WHEN MUSLIMS ATTACK,

2.) WAIT FOR THE MUSLIMS TO FINISH THEIR BLOOD SPORT KILLING, AND

3.) THEN DO NOTHING.”

Since September 11, 2012, Obama has:

* Invoked the field-tested, Clinton-Obama Benghazi Rule for the US in order to allow the ongoing genocide of Christians, and Yazidis in current US Ally Iraq;

* Refused to keep his Word on his Redline in Syria;

* Released the GITMO FIVE to supervise the rapid growth of ISIS;

* Repeatedly proclaimed that HIS “American People” are war weary;

* Ordered the dismissing of front-line US Military Officers;

* Ordered the downsizing of the US Military to that of pre-WW2 levels;

* Repeatedly promised to unilaterally quit fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan; and

* Invested more hours in playing Golf than visits to the Pentagon.

If Muslim Hussein Obama were to be forced to resign today, would Catholic Joe Biden revoke the Benghazi Rule co-authored by Hillary Clinton and Hussein Obama, and bring the fight to ISIS?


4 posted on 08/22/2014 7:34:58 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Increased greens fees?

Post of the day.

You know it!


5 posted on 08/22/2014 7:36:46 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Please $upport Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Did Obama ever get his money for the illegal kids?


6 posted on 08/22/2014 7:53:49 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

If the Republicans ask for a comprehensive plan and refuse to fund mere “community organizer” tactical strikes, he’ll then turn around and blame the Republicans. This is his “politicization” of foreign affairs.


7 posted on 08/22/2014 8:29:51 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
President Barack Obama could ask the U.S. Congress in coming weeks to approve new funds for airstrikes against Islamic State targets

Why doesn't he bomb them with all that toxic crap that was left in the broke solar plants he funded?

8 posted on 08/22/2014 8:58:22 PM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This is absolutely too precious for words: the POTUS (aka Commander-in-Chief) is incapable of leading or formulating a plan and he punts the ball to Congress? NONE of the idiots in this picture could lead a group of randy gay poofters through a male homosexual bath house with a wad of $1,000 bills and a wallet full of credit cards.


9 posted on 08/23/2014 12:18:32 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

In otherwords Obama will attach military spending to Amnesty. Republicans will not pass the bill and Obama will cry that republicans don’t want to fight ISIS.

WAK UP REPUBLICANS.


10 posted on 08/23/2014 2:01:33 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; All

11 posted on 08/23/2014 4:17:09 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: refermech

LOL


12 posted on 08/23/2014 4:19:16 AM PDT by kjam22 (my music video "If My People" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74b20RjILy4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Always, always it’s we need more money. Sounds like another Cloward-Piven exercise to me.


13 posted on 08/23/2014 5:34:38 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

No, it is an opportunity to steal more money.

Having exhausted the till, new money is needed to steal for those in the state of Grace. For ever $billion supplemental funds, at least $300 million will be siphoned off to Democrats.

The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.


14 posted on 08/23/2014 5:41:12 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

Our money funded ISIS when it was Syrian Rebels, now they are ISIS and he wants more money to bomb them?


15 posted on 08/23/2014 5:46:58 AM PDT by rxtn41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bert

It’s the same thing, Keep on pushing ‘something’ until the process, money supply, patience, whatever breaks and the ‘people’ say NO-MORE!

Then the stick comes out and the government says we are in revolt against it.


16 posted on 08/23/2014 6:09:37 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The congress should ask then if Obama is seeking congressional approval for strikes against ISIS. Make the Democrats vote for use of force.


17 posted on 08/23/2014 6:35:47 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rxtn41
Our money funded ISIS when it was Syrian Rebels, now they are ISIS and he wants more money to bomb them?

And the advanced military equipment and money that they have stolen was all given to other Iraqi groups to help stand up their country. We are financing both sides of this conflict.

18 posted on 08/23/2014 7:01:10 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson