Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The value of ivory increases when the supply is diminished. Result: more poaching leading to extinction.
1 posted on 08/22/2014 8:19:28 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Second Amendment First

Didn’t the Taliban destroy historic relics? How is the US government any different?


2 posted on 08/22/2014 8:22:11 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

So, what am I to do with the beautiful, carved ivory tusk my folks brought back from overseas? It was purchased in 1961. Am I a criminal now for owning that? Should I just commit suicide? Or, should I make sure when I commit suicide I take a lot of Obama’s sons with me? Or should I do it in a mosque full of Muslims? I want to make sure my death for owning ivory serves a real purpose. Suggestions?


4 posted on 08/22/2014 8:24:32 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Did the paper say the tides should stop too?

Even King Canute only did that to prove he was not powerful enough to stop them.


5 posted on 08/22/2014 8:28:25 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Agree .... Critters get old, herds must be culled etc ... sell the ivory and donate part of proceeds to conservation efforts.

My opinion..


6 posted on 08/22/2014 8:28:38 AM PDT by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Stupid Gubment has no idea of the concept of “Supply and Demand.” Waiting for the next Headline...”Ivory prices skyrockets in illegal markets.


8 posted on 08/22/2014 8:29:59 AM PDT by IC Ken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

That was a really dumb idea.

But I’m sure it gave them a warm feeling of superiority to destroy all that ivory.


9 posted on 08/22/2014 8:30:38 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
In fact, Ivory would guarantee that elephants wouldn't go extinct. A managed cultivation of Ivory would encourage breeding and protection of the elephants as they would be private property.

Is it any different than what we do to animals for meat? There's a good reason that cows aren't extinct.

11 posted on 08/22/2014 8:32:59 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Less Than 17K To Go And The Freepathon Is Over!


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

13 posted on 08/22/2014 8:34:10 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
It's getting a little out of hand:

Teens' Bagpipes Seized At U.S. Border Crossing For Ivory Pieces

U.S. prohibits importing ivory taken after 1976. Even though the boys had certificates showing their ivory is older — Campbell's pipes date to 1936 — U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized the pipes in Highgate Springs, Vermont. Well, not all of them: The boys took every other part possible and left the ivory with Border Patrol so nobody else could make a full set out of the parts.

Those kids were lucky their bagpipes weren't smashed to smithereens - with no compensation, of course.

And yes, create a shortage where there is a market, the price soars and the poachers become more brazen.

21 posted on 08/22/2014 9:07:34 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (Tired? There's a napp for that!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
It makes no sense destroying valuable artifacts made before the ban was in effect.
The war on Ivory will work as well as the war on drugs.

22 posted on 08/22/2014 9:15:52 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

I was raised in the Midwest, and we were brought up that if you kill it, you better eat it. You can save something like the head for a trophy, but you didn’t hunt for trophies.

It’s like the old joke they tell about raising hogs on the farm in the old days - ‘we used everything but the squeal’. That’s they way it should be. Slaughtering animals should be for the purposes of keeping people fed and clothed (at least back in the days when there were no synthetics).

Killing animals for things like ivory, for vanity and decoration and ornaments, while leaving the animal to rot, is an unacceptable travesty.


23 posted on 08/22/2014 9:17:46 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
How is it that Lefties can always come up with the most illogical solution to any problem?

They seem to take pride in it.

28 posted on 08/22/2014 9:43:33 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson