Posted on 08/21/2014 8:50:09 AM PDT by ckilmer
The clear liquid flowing from a collection of pipes and wires in a Hayward industrial park smells just like gasoline, and for all practical purposes, it is.
But it wasn’t made from crude oil. Instead, it came from natural gas, the fuel whose sudden abundance in America is reshaping the country’s energy landscape.
Siluria Technologies says it can produce large quantities of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and chemicals at a lower cost than traditional refineries and chemical plants. At today’s natural gas prices, Siluria’s technology could make gasoline at roughly $1 per gallon, according to the company.
The oil industry has taken notice. Siluria reported Wednesday that its latest, $30 million fundraising round was led by Saudi Aramco, the world’s largest oil company.
For Aramco, the move may seem counterintuitive, since Siluria’s technology could turn natural gas into a competitor for crude oil. But Siluria, headquartered in San Francisco, sees it as a natural fit.
“Their business isn’t just oil,” said Ed Dineen, Siluria’s chief executive officer. “It’s oil and gas and petrochemicals and power. And when they look across that spectrum, they have a strong interest in increasing the value of their gas. This will allow them to do that.”
Aramco will join Siluria’s board of directors and has put together a team studying ways to deploy the technology in Saudi Arabia. Founded in 2008, Siluria has now raised $96 million from such investors as Bright Capital, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Lux Capital.
The company has also built a short but impressive roster of partners, including the Linde Group, a global company specializing in industrial gases and engineering. Braskem, a petrochemicals giant based in Brazil, is installing Siluria’s system at one of its plants in La Porte, Texas, with operations expected to begin later this year.
Those alliances will help Siluria make the leap from tiny pilot plants, such as the one crafting small-batch gasoline in Hayward, to full production. And they reflect the company’s approach. Siluria wants to partner with oil and chemical companies, not supplant them.
“What we’ve done with these partnerships, with Aramco and Braskem, is we’ve essentially brought the customers into the company,” said Rahul Iyer, vice president of corporate development.
The ability to make liquid fuels from natural gas isn’t new, dating back to the 1920s. But the most common way of doing it, a process known as Fischer-Tropsch, is neither cheap nor easy, requiring high heat and pressure to work. Royal Dutch Shell last year shelved plans for a $20 billion “gas-to-liquids” plant in Louisiana, in part due to the cost.
Siluria’s process doesn’t require intense pressure and heat. It uses a chemical catalyst to take methane molecules from natural gas and combine them into ethylene, a hydrocarbon widely used in the chemical industry. The ethylene can be sold as its own product, or it can be processed with other catalysts to produce liquid fuels. The catalysts stitch together carbon atoms from the ethylene to create gasoline or diesel or jet fuel.
“With a refinery, you’re essentially boiling oil and separating it out,” Iyer said. “We’re building new molecules that weren’t there before.”
The controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has flooded the United States with inexpensive natural gas, pried from shale formations beneath Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia. Siluria’s technology represents one way to take advantage of that surge.
But it can have other uses. Oil companies often burn off, or “flare,” the natural gas that comes out of oil wells if they don’t have a pipeline to carry the gas to market. Siluria’s technology, deployed at oil fields, could create a valuable liquid commodity that would be easy to transport.
“If you’ve got stranded gas on the North Slope of Alaska or Kazakhstan, if you’ve got gas flaring in North Dakota or coming off of landfills, those are all opportunities for our technology,” Dineen said.
Siluria’s method for making fuel produces fewer greenhouse gas emissions than traditional refining, according to the company. There are no emissions of sulfur dioxide or mercury, either. And the carbon dioxide given off by Siluria’s methane-to-ethylene process is pure enough to be sold as its own product.
But Siluria’s version of gasoline still comes from fossil fuel. That limits its appeal as an alternative to oil, at least in the eyes of researchers concerned about global warming.
“My view is, it’ll make some people some money, but it’s not much of a solution, because you’re still burning fuel and creating emissions,” said Daniel Kammen, director of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory at UC Berkeley. “It’s a good business deal.”
ethylene, a hydrocarbon widely used in the chemical industry. The ethylene can be sold as its own product, or it can be processed with other catalysts to produce liquid fuels.
- - - - -
Currently, ethane, used to make ethylene is in high supply and relatively low prices due to increased production from wet gas shale fields.
Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....
If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST jut FReepmail me.....
This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days..... Ping!.............................
What happens after you cut it with $5.00 a gallon Ethanol?
This does me no good unless they can do the same with diesel.Anywhere between $0.90 and $1.10 a gallon would be great.
10 therms is almost a thousand cubic feet of Natural Gas. Industrial Processes who buy gas in far greater quantity pay about half that.
Natural Gas Prices
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm
Very interesting, thanks for posting the article. I guess we better up the attacks on the frackers!
“there will be “special” taxes levied.....to fund “Further...Research” into developing Truly Organic Free Range Gasoline!”
Yes from specially developed gasoline Holsteins.
aha I see your current on the bleeding edge research...
How much gas is being flared in the Eagle Ford?
Not as much as you might think. Far less than the Bakken. Texas has more limits to what can be flared and for how long.
The state’s flaring regulations — know as Rule 32 — allow operators to burn off excess natural gas while drilling wells and continue to do so up to 10 days after drilling is completed. In other cases, operators can apply for permits that allow up to 180 days of flaring.
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/02/05/state-oil-regulator-warns-of-gas-flares/
Anyone know?
From Cow Fart to Horse Power?
Now this i like the sound off. :)
bump, facepalm and LOL
BFL
Imagine the necessary “re-branding”..of the corporate IMAGE...of an Oil Company willing to promote “ Truly Organic Free Range Gasoline”
I’d like to see them do a commercially-viable coal to gasoline process.
Aramco will join Siluria’s board of directors and has put together a team studying ways to deploy the technology in Saudi Arabia. Founded in 2008, Siluria has now raised $96 million from such investors as Bright Capital, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Lux Capital.
***
If their story is as good as it sounds, they wouldn’t need these continuous investments. They would be on their own making a profit by now.
I am aware of Rule 32 and emergency flare orders but some of the flares appear, by eyes on inspection, to have become permanent.
Lower energy prices do not fit ANYWHERE in the plans of the Radical Academics, or the Agenda 21 folks.
Lower energy prices mean PROSPERITY, and that means loss-of-control for those that want to rule us.
If new wells are drilled close enough, the old flare may be used for new wells rather than make one for every well.
Or they may be violating the law and hoping the gas gathering system gets installed before they get shut down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
