Palestinian Islamic Scholar Explains Jewish Control of America on Turkish TV

Mukhlis Barzaq, head of the research unit of the Association of Palestinian Islamic Scholars Abroad was interviewed recently on a Turkish TV channel. Barzaq claimed the Jews own the largest media outlets in the U.S., infiltrate election campaigns and practiced extortion, using sex and money to gain political and economic control and to destroy the moral values of nation of the country.

While the mainstream media has given some coverage to the growing anti-Semitism in Europe, they have largely ignored the widespread hatred in the Muslim world. Unlike the hatred in Europe, the authorities, even in so-called moderate countries like Turkey, generally condone anti-Semitism in Muslim States.

The Jew-hatred spewed by the Islamic scholar during the July 25 interview with the Turkish station outlined a vast Jewish conspiracy:

It's true that [the Jews] have money, but it is not like the Arab or Muslim money. They make use of this money. When they reached America, they bought the largest media outlets. They know that by buying the media, they gain significant influence over American public opinion.
Then they infiltrated the election campaigns. They invested their money in specific things. Then they mobilized their community in order to achieve a high voter turnout. Over 90% of the Jews vote, whereas in the general U.S. population, the turnout does not exceed 50%. In addition, they concentrate in the cities, in order to increase the clout of the Jewish vote.
On top of that, they have practiced extortion. You are familiar with the history of the Jews when it comes to sex and money – the Lewinsky affair was not that long ago... They know how to take advantage of any situation.
They destroy the moral values of all nations. They control the media, the theater, and the economy. They influence politics, the media, and the economy, while the money of the Arabs and the Muslims is all over the place. They do not invest this money in any specific goal.

H/T MEMRI

“It’s public knowledge...”

Obviously not. Cite your sources other than speculation from a blog that speaks in general about circumcision and its history in England. Your comments are not only egregious they are on par with The Protocols of Zion. No doubt you may also think that Jews have used the blood of children to make matzo.

Your third account of I know someone who knew someone who said that someone told them is laughable at best

Dinner party conversation is NOT evidence. What is wrong with you???

Are you so unaware of the history of circumcision that you do not know that in Britain and the US the circumcision is and has been (since the mid 1800s) a standard routine procedure done at birth by doctor’s???? Citing folks who talk in the chattering classes is such lunacy. There is NO indication that ‘the royals’ have used Jewish mohels for this purpose. Your so called evidence is so Alex Jones in nature as to be useless. Blogging pieces from the ‘jewishpress’ et al do not gnome close to being anything more that the usual gossip and rumor trash that things like the Star and the Worlde News of the Weird put out.

I am not quoting bloggers who spread third hand commentary.

Apparently you have never read about the history or purpose of circumcision (not all of which is religious).

I asked you for an actual source about a mohel being used by the royals for circumcision and what I get are little bloggy snipers of third hand a friend of a sister of a cousin of a neighbor stuff.

I have no intention go going away. Your initial comments were that it was well known that.....since it is not well known and I asked for your source what you have dumped are not sources but gossip.

If that is the best you can do.....I feel sorry for you

Prince Charles was circumcised by a Jewish mohel, as was the family custom. Princess Diana apparently forbade it for Prince William, and little Prince George seems also to have been left uncut, though the family will not say so officially.

The British royals believe they are the Davidic dynasty.

They should disavow this claim just as Hirohito disavowed his claims to (chas veshalom!) "divinity."

Nifster, I don't know what in the world has you so riled up, but cut it out. Jjotto is a very valued Orthodox Jewish FReeper and your insulting him as some sort of anti-Semite is way beyond the pale.

The British royal family has long thought it is the Davidic Dynasty. So do some "British-Israelite" sects throughout the world. This is why they were traditionally circumsized.

Now behave.

They have *kind of* disavowed it. I believe that at one time official royal genealogies showed David and Biblical prophets in the line, but those references have been removed now.

And the royals seem to have made sure that it was publicized that Prince William and Price George were not circumcized, especially by a mohel! I believe Lionel Snowman, the son of the rabbi that did Charles, is still active as a mohel.

I’m not sure the Davidic descent story was believed from ancient times but rather is a creation of the ‘British Israel’ movement that was popular 100-150 years ago.

Someone pointed out that such claims may have fed Continental anti-Semites’ paranoia about ‘hidden Jews’ that ultimately resulted in WWII. That does seem plausible.

I’d guess the current royals are taught that it was just a myth.

I simply cite that it is not common knowledge....It may be what the orthodox community talks about but it is not official policy nor is it expressed by the royals at all.

It is in no way rude to ask someone for real proof as opposed to those rumors that the chattering classes spread. Show me some citation that the British royal family considers itself the Davidic Dynasty....

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.