How the Tea Party became as corrupt as the Beltway it loathes

This Week ^ | 8-7-14 | Michael Brendan Dougherty

[afraidfortherepublic]

This week, ProPublica released a report on the financial (and moral) corruption of a Tea Party group operating under the name Move America Forward, which was founded by one Sal Russo. Russo also helped start the Our Country Deserves Better PAC, aka the Tea Party Express. Move America Forward has run fake drives to give care packages to troops, stolen images of other charitable campaigns and passed them off as its own, and trumpeted a nonexistent partnership with Walter Reed Hospital — all while funneling very real millions to itself. The group is an industry leader at taking your Tea Party sentiments (if you have them) and turning them into profits.

Unfortunately, the continuing success of Sal Russo and the Tea Party Express is emblematic of a larger failure of the American right — and perhaps the larger project of American self-governance.

Earlier this year, The Daily Caller's Alexis Levinson reported that other Tea Party groups that had raised millions spent up to 80 percent of their money on operating expenditures, salaries, consultants, and mailing list companies, which were often owned by the people who ran the groups themselves. The Tea Party is essentially a landlord class; its fiefdom is the truly felt convictions of others.

There is nothing new about this. The Tea Party gained traction in an environment defined by massive resentment and fear directed at the Obama presidency, disgust at the bailouts of the Bush and Obama eras, and the wreckage of a Republican electoral defeat, all of which was especially conducive to the growth of parasite groups like the Tea Party Express.

In February of 2010, I reported a story from a "Tea Party Convention" in Nashville, hosted by the for-profit group Tea Party Nation. Leader Juddson Phillips left his job as a lawyer to draw a salary. Tickets for this grassroots uprising cost more than $500. The great motive behind it was transforming the organizers into richer men and political kingmakers in their state.

This gross profiteering is not unique to right-wingers. Political consultants do hilariously weird things. John Weaver, a consultant who advises prominent Republican candidates to enact his own distaste for conservatives, pulled an all-timer when he convinced his candidate's campaign to pay him, partly, through a corporation that shared the exact same name as that of another consultant's business. That helped to hide how well he was doing — until it didn't.

People who give themselves to full-time political activism deserve some recompense for their work and expertise. And of course, even the most populist of political movements will attract, and even require, professional leadership from without. After all, even punk rock bands require "the suits" to handle business and arrange for the to-be-destroyed hotel room. Even St. Paul demanded payment for his services.

But there was something especially galling about the level of self-dealing enrichment and deception at the head of the Tea Party movement, particularly because the movement started as a disgusted response to the self-dealing enrichment and deception in Washington.

Profiteering has been an acute problem almost right from the beginning for the Tea Party. It is like the reverse mortgage industry of politics: making money by giving an awful deal to an older, whiter customer base, then leaving town just as the fools realize it leaves them with nothing.

It's easy to write them off as just another bunch of opportunists. But the endemic corruption of this movement should trouble the American right, if not the American conscience. The conservative diagnosis of Washington's brokenness is that Americans have outsourced the task of self-government to a managerial class in Washington, a corruption that has transformed our nation's capital into "the Beltway," a shorthand for D.C.'s toxic culture of cronyism.

The populist right's instinctive response — the Tea Party — immediately became just another added layer of cronyism. A grassroots corruption. Really, a weed. If the American people have outsourced their self-government to Washington, the conservative movement made another dirty deal, allowing itself to be entertained in outrage carnivals run by for-profit activists. Excepting the exceptions, the populist right's response to dishonesty and graft was to generate another set of swindlers who wear flag-lapel pins, lie to their faces, and help themselves to the cash.

Yes, we built that. And H.L. Mencken laughs. Self-government is just another product, and no one can be bothered to read the fine print.

[Elsie]

You can throw the word LOSER around all you want, but I’d rather have a LOSER than Obama.

What does it profit a man, to own the whole world, yet LOSE his own soul?

[FreedomStar3028]

I told you I’m done with this conversation. There is no point trying to rationalize this to you. For some reason you think that voting Romney would cost you your soul? But keeping Obama in the WH doesn’t. Hmmmm Hmmmmm Hmmmmm....interesting times.

[Resettozero]

Hmmmm Hmmmmm Hmmmmm....interesting times.

Indeed. One poster who thinks of himself as a conservative is not going to dissuade another poster who considers himself a conservative but has a different view of the world.

Not by browbeating and aggressive intimidations, not by demonstrating an air of superiority because of our positions in society, not by personal rationalizations and the foisting on other FReepers of what little we do understand.

We conservatives who post on FR too frequently show disarray and amateurism in the way we communicate our thoughts and expertise in civil conversation. And we incorrectly use other sloppy-minded blogs as reference points for our justification.

I'm not directing this post to you alone, but to almost all FR posters...including me.

A great deal needs to improve rapidly regarding what others see about us on Free Republic.

[Da Bilge Troll]

I heard the Tea Party was dead! Oh, woe! Woe is me!

[editor-surveyor]

You’re mentally ill.

[Syncro]

You're mentally ill.

No, I love women.

I guess that is a mental illness to someone like you.

I would never spew the vitriolic hatred towards women that you do.

You are a very sick and dangerous person.

[editor-surveyor]

You spew nothing but hatred here every day.

I stated a fact, not hatred. Your dislike of the facts doesn’t make them hatred.

You truly are a sick and dangerous person. Your search for self aggrandizement leads you to strange bedfellows with every kook political scam that poses as a conservative org, but does nothing but scam people for money.

Then you attack those that expose the truth.
.

[editor-surveyor]

>> “Any GOP politician not getting elected is completely the GOPe’s fault as they have a war against conservative candidates and by extension our Constitutional Republic.” <<

.
On this we can agree.

>> “We have met the enemy and he is us” (Walt Kelly) <<

[editor-surveyor]

There’s no disinformation about you.

You’re famous now for your ambition for visibility and fame, and you’ve got it. Just not what you’d hoped for.

Rubbing elbows with failed, fired talk hosts of yesteryear is not a path to anything but ultimately more obscurity.

Go soak your wounds little boy.
.

[Syncro]

Keep exposing yourself, your envy is showing.

Nary a scratch on me, hater.

Go back to fighting women, it’s more to your liking troll.

[rdb3]

If true, did they hire trolls to troll FR and other conservative sites to slander and malign any Republican?

Gramps, I believe that that's been going on for years!

Jesus Christ: You can’t impeach Him and He ain’t going to resign.