Skip to comments.
Actor Beau Bridges Praises James Brady's Firearms Fight
newsmax.com ^
| 8/6/2014
| Drew MacKenzie
Posted on 08/06/2014 9:18:37 AM PDT by rktman
Hollywood star Beau Bridges has attacked the proliferation of firearms in the United States while praising former White House press secretary James Brady for his battle to impose greater government gun controls.
He added, “Why would any civilian want a weapon that sprays bullets at such a rapid rate? Certainly not to use for hunting or target shooting.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; brady; guncontrolnazis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: glock rocks
41
posted on
08/06/2014 11:08:49 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
To: trisham
Consider the source.
I couldn’t care less what he thinks, or says, or does.
42
posted on
08/06/2014 11:09:27 AM PDT
by
Tolkien
(Grace is the Essence of the Gospel; Gratitude is the Essence of Ethics.)
To: Tolkien
His father and his brother we the ones with talent.
43
posted on
08/06/2014 11:12:36 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: rktman
Well, that seals it for me then. If some stupid actor whom I could not pick out of a lineup says guns are bad, then I am against guns.
And I seriously doubt that the brain-damaged Brady was actually running any of the gun-grabbing campaign. It was his wife and others who just used him as a puppet.
44
posted on
08/06/2014 11:21:20 AM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(31 May 2014: Obamugabe officially declares the USA a vanquished subject of the Global Caliphate.)
To: rktman
Ole Bo still snorting snow and watchin' de Presstitutes puke out never-ending sob stories about the need to eliminate those "dangerous guns".
====================================================================================================
====================================================================================================
====================================================================================================
45
posted on
08/06/2014 11:23:16 AM PDT
by
Col Freeper
(FR: A smorgasbord of Conservative Mindfood - dig in and enjoy it!)
To: Ohioan
46
posted on
08/06/2014 11:25:01 AM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(31 May 2014: Obamugabe officially declares the USA a vanquished subject of the Global Caliphate.)
To: driftdiver
“Guess he’s looking for a new movie role.”
Yep. This is how washed-up Hollyweirdos signal,
“I need a job, comrade agit-prop commisars.”
47
posted on
08/06/2014 11:25:09 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: ozzymandus
48
posted on
08/06/2014 11:25:26 AM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(31 May 2014: Obamugabe officially declares the USA a vanquished subject of the Global Caliphate.)
To: rktman
He added, “Why would any civilian want a weapon that sprays bullets at such a rapid rate? Certainly not to use for hunting or target shooting."You're right, Beau, that's not what I want it for.
Thank God the 2nd Amendment isn't about hunting or target shooting!
If you really want to take it from me though ... Molon Labe! :-)
49
posted on
08/06/2014 11:39:01 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
To: trisham
His anti-gun daddy, Lloyd Bridges, injected his anti-2nd Amendment poison into his sons Beau and Jeff.
To: MasterGunner01
51
posted on
08/06/2014 2:01:20 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: rktman
Guess he only likes guns when he's getting paid to.
52
posted on
08/06/2014 2:15:23 PM PDT
by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: TigersEye
"Why would any civilian want a weapon that sprays bullets at such a rapid rate? Certainly not to use for hunting or target shooting."
He's quite correct. Deployment of high-rate indirect suppressing fire against the enemies of the People is not accurately termed as "target shooting", and in covertly engineered one-one-one 4GW encounters it's also rather graceless to call it "hunting" regardless of the skills involved.
Shrug. Don't have a problem with his comments.
To: rktman
Suck it, Beau. Go live U.K., ya puke.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
