Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York patient ‘unlikely to have Ebola,’ Health Department says
Washington Post ^ | 08/04/2014 | By Elahe Izadi

Posted on 08/04/2014 7:09:01 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

A man who was tested for Ebola at New York’s Mount Sinai Hospital on Monday is “unlikely” to have the virus, the city’s health department said.

“After consultation with CDC and Mount Sinai, the Health Department has concluded that the patient is unlikely to have Ebola,” the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene said in a statement early Monday evening. “Specimens are being tested for common causes of illness and to definitively exclude Ebola.”

The male patient had come to the hospital’s emergency room early Monday morning with a high fever and gastrointestinal problems, according to the hospital. The man had recently visited a West African country where Ebola has been reported, the hospital said; he was “placed in strict isolation” and screened for the virus.

“All necessary steps are being taken to ensure the safety of all patients, visitors and staff,” the hospital said in a statement Monday afternoon. “We will continue to work closely with federal, state and city health officials to address and monitor this case, keep the community informed and provide the best quality care to all of our patients.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: ebola; newyork; virus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: SeekAndFind

Very comforting to a city of millions..tightly packed in close proximity to one another....what could go wrong?


21 posted on 08/05/2014 1:37:34 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan


It will take 1-2 days for the results to come back. Evidently, there have been six (or so) cases recently where an individual has returned here from an Ebola-stricken West African country with symptoms consistent with Ebola, but none of them had Ebola. “

Considering that False Negatives seems common, do we know about these ‘none who had Ebola’ : were they tested a second time for Ebola, and was what they did actually have confirmed ?


22 posted on 08/05/2014 1:54:17 AM PDT by PraiseTheLord (have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: antceecee
"An Ebola vaccine “would be very helpful,” he said, but it won’t exist anytime soon. Still, he added, health workers can find and isolate patients, trace the contacts they’ve made and encourage safe burial practices for those who fall ill."

CDC: U.S. can't seal borders to stop Ebola

23 posted on 08/05/2014 2:06:03 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Can we believe anything told us by the government without independent verification? Would they suppress any report of Ebola loose in the population, if they could? For that matter, how many disease reports from the illegal alien processing facilities are already being suppressed so they can transport the vectors all over the US?


24 posted on 08/05/2014 3:08:07 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

DON'T TRUST, VERIFY


25 posted on 08/05/2014 5:29:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

What ever happened to the rapid response tests they’re using in W. Africa?


26 posted on 08/05/2014 7:01:22 AM PDT by Raebie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
Crap, there is no need to have any tests because it's "unlikely" that the man may have Ebola. It would have been nice if they gave us facts why the city's health department deems it "unlikely".

Who needs facts when there is consensus among pundits?

27 posted on 08/05/2014 7:12:50 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (CNN suppressed news to maintain their Baghdad bureau under Saddam; they just did the same for Hamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PraiseTheLord

I have no idea.


28 posted on 08/05/2014 8:13:05 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PraiseTheLord

I have no idea.


29 posted on 08/05/2014 8:15:37 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Would they suppress any report of Ebola loose in the population, if they could?

Of course - to prevent panic.

30 posted on 08/05/2014 8:30:20 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Raebie

If I had to guess, I would say those tests are not readily available in the US because we don’t have Ebola outbreaks. It’s a good question.


31 posted on 08/05/2014 8:34:54 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson