Lamont, you big dummy.
Posted on 07/30/2014 10:55:18 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Are you okay, Marc? I have a hankie you can use to wipe away that rolling teardrop that Alan Dershowitz possibly caused during your heated debate on Israel and Gaza during CNN Tonight on Monday.
The weird thing is that Marc Lamont Hill was actually crying over Israel (GASP!) defending itself against both rocket attacks and secret tunnels built from Gaza into Israel for the purpose of killing and kidnapping. A video was posted by Soopermexican showing Hill's tear of absurdly misplaced compassion (or was it frustration from arguiing with Dershowitz?) rolling down his cheek.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
ping for later
Marc Lamont Hill is a Communist who believes all cop killers should be set free
Lamont, you big dummy.
Marc is frustrated and sad that Hamas’s planned slaughter of Israelis has been disrupted/destroyed.Meanwhile,The jews are still God’s chosen people and his wrath against anti-semites grows stronger daily.
I read the other day that up to 160 children had died digging tunnels for Hamas.
If I recall correctly, Hill was temporarily suspended by Ted Baxter for links to Muslim terrorist groups. After scrubbing his webpage he was reinstated. [This was before being fired by Rupert Murdoch some years later for links to domestic terrorists and cop killers.]
Defending Dan Rather was the start of my contempt for him.
Hill annoys the hell out of me because he speaks as though he swallowed a handful of speed before going on the air.
Not Dwayne Dibbley!
Indeed!
And when His Wrath does unleash, oh what a sight it will be.
Marc may be crying now....he’ll be doing something else then.
and Israel is callously disregarding the sacrifice those children made by destroying the tunnels!
How sad is that?
//sarc
The little weasel was crying for his 0bammy!
he speaks as though he swallowed a handful of speed before going on the air.
_____________________________________________
You mean like Joe Biden’s last debate?
The thing about Hill is he’s just another black nationalist academic who learned everything he knows about the African-American experience from courses he took in college.
He’s not a good spokesperson for black Americans because he is biased toward liberation theology and anti-colonialism. I can’t even see the point of him speaking on the Israel-Palestine conflict, because by definition he cannot be objective. An anti-colonialist will only view that conflict through the lens that Israel is an invading colonial power from Europe, bent on oppressing a native tribe. Hill wears that bias on his sleeve and is about as unbiased as a CAIR spokesman in this matter.
The problem with the anti-colonialist position is the Palestinians are not a native tribe. They are a synthetic people with no historic claim to the land they are squatting on. They are motivated by anti-Semitism and genocide, which should automatically strip them of any legitimacy in the civilized world. But it doesn’t, because that’s the shared sentiment among every Muslim country in the Middle East, the European Union, and those who control the UN.
I don’t understand why people can’t see this, except that they’re apparently not supposed to use words like “anti-Semitism” or “genocide” when discussing this situation. It would sure make things a lot more clear if they could.
I saw part of that. He was crying because Dershowitz spanked him so hard. Hill is a racist, extreme left, academic punk, with one of those made-up college teaching positions for leftist losers. Dershowitz was outnumbered 3 to 1, including the “host” who didn’t want him to talk, and he still slaughtered the anti-semites.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.