I’ve always believed that evolutionism reduces IQ. I mean, you’re talking about believing in something which requires an infinite sequence of zero probability events.
5 known atheist in the world ?
 |
Freedom ≠ Free Stuff☭ |  |
| I, for one, welcome our new Cybernetic Overlords /. | ||
|
|
||
Silly college student, "give everyone a fair shot," really?... from liberals?? Open your eyes and grow up.
off the top of my head, by probabilities...
what can you tell about someone if their IQ is 100:
- average white or asian person
- above average black person
- has done heavily or is doing drugs
- didn’t attend college
- makes less then $50k/yr
- out of work or going check to check
- has less then $500 in the bank
- works for others
- left aligned politically
- never married or divorced
- has kids
if their IQ is 125:
- above average white or asian person
- top 5% black person
- attended college
- could have done drugs, most likely doesn’t if older then 30
- makes $50k+/yr
- runs a business
- right aligned politically
- never married or divorced
- may have kids
could be off on some of these as I’m not looking up the stats, but it makes for an interesting exercise in using probabilities to determine behaviors
Why is psychology part of the core, required curriculum for all students? I cannot imagine any accrediting organization requiring that.
We have to admit that there are some PRETTY DUMB Christians in this country. They VOTE DEMOCRAT and then complain about the country going to hell...
The real answer is Theo is more liberal than Aine.
Pray America wakes up
Just proves that whoever wrote the test up has an IQ of 70.
“Theo” as in Theology.
These leftists are despicable as well as incredibly stupid.
Of course, the solution to this problem is not even more restrictions on speech.
The solution to this problem is to call out the professor as a bigot, shame him, and move on.
People should be writing all sorts of stupid things at universities.
It turns out, of course, if you think the Second Amendment is limited to organized militias and there is no individual right to keep and bear arms, and that states can restrict the right any way they choose, you get a perfect score, and know everything there is to know about the Second Amendment.
But if you think the right to keep and bear arms is a natural, pre-existing right of all people, and all the Second Amendment says it that right shall not be infringed, it turns out you know nothing at all, according to our betters at The Christian Science Monitor.
If atheists are so smart, why did the majority of them vote for Obama?
If the Ohio Christians allow this kind of stuff to continue, they are. The President of the University should be called to account for this.
Which one will die of aids?
The difference is ... the Christian is smart enough to know which answer to choose to get the quiz points ... the atheist is dumb enough to believe that answer is true.
Hey, it’s a psych class.
We’re not exactly talkin’ the sharpest knives in the drawer when we look at the history of that clownfest profession.
They’re on the “Nancy Pelosi” IQ level.
Well at least they had the correct answer in there...number two is clearly correct!
Let’s see, people who believe you can PROVE A NEGATIVE are smarter ?
How’s that work again ?
They should ALL flunk logic, for sure.