Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wikipedia temporarily bans Congress IPs over ‘persistent’ editing
Russian Propaganda Today ^ | July 25, 2014 | Vladimir Putin

Posted on 07/25/2014 10:01:24 PM PDT by McGruff

Capitol computers have been barred from modifying Wikipedia for 10 days, due to “persistent disruptive editing.” The legislative body was told by Wikipedia administrators that it is welcome to make “useful contributions” once the ban expires.

“You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Mediaite. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions,” a Wikipedia message said.

“If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block,” administrator Tom Morris told Congress on Thursday.

The ban follows an existing one-day ban that was imposed earlier this month in reactoin to the Mediaite incident referenced by Morris. IPs originating from Congress computers were found to have edited Mediaite's description to a “sexist transphobic news and opinion blog” that “automatically assumes that someone is male without any evidence.”

“Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mediaite. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed,” wrote yeoman editor 'WineGuy.'

One Washington staffer protested that they were all being banned for the “actions of two or three.”

“Out of over 9,000 staffers in the House, should we really be banning this whole IP range,” he said, adding that some of them were just making grammatical edits or “adding information about birds in Omsk.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
I only post this because there was outrage earlier this week the those evil Russians had done the same thing.

Although our administration has a lot more history they need to rewrite. IRS scandal, VA scandal, Illegal alien invasion...

1 posted on 07/25/2014 10:01:24 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: McGruff

A world full of Winston Smiths.


2 posted on 07/25/2014 10:04:25 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Wikipedia is led by liberals, but apparently even liberals hit a point where too much monkey business is too much. (Besides it was making Wikipedia look silly.)


3 posted on 07/25/2014 10:08:09 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Got this from Wikipedia. Before someone edits it.

Winston Smith works as a clerk in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, where his job is to rewrite historical documents so they match the constantly changing current party line. This involves revising newspaper articles and doctoring photographs—mostly to remove “unpersons,” people who have fallen foul of the party. Because of his proximity to the mechanics of rewriting history, Winston Smith nurses doubts about the Party and its monopoly on truth. Whenever Winston appears in front of a telescreen, he is referred to as “6079 Smith W”.

Spot on.


4 posted on 07/25/2014 10:08:43 PM PDT by McGruff (We can't even secure our border never mind Ukraine's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
“Out of over 9,000 staffers in the House, should we really be banning this whole IP range,” he said, adding that some of them were just making grammatical edits or “adding information about birds in Omsk.”

"Adding information about birds in Omsk" comes from Congressional staffers, but they can't find a "typo" about state vs. federal exchange subsidies?

-PJ

5 posted on 07/25/2014 10:13:40 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Part of the job descriptions of congressional staffers is “making unsolicited, unpaid improvements to Wikipedia”?
And remember Li’l Debbie Wasserman during the sequester whining about her staffers not being able to afford ‘good restaurants’?
They can surf the interweb from their parent’s homes. If they don’t have enough to do, send them ho m e!


6 posted on 07/25/2014 10:22:45 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

They will probably continue to do this from private internet accounts and the chaos will resume.


7 posted on 07/25/2014 10:28:00 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I assumed this stuff was coming from OFA trolls.


8 posted on 07/25/2014 10:33:19 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
Wikipedia is a politically left leaning online wiki-based encyclopedia[1] project owned by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation and financially supported by a $20 million annual online fundraising drive[2] and well as other grants.

Wikipedia is written and edited by an ad hoc assemblage of mostly anonymous persons who are mostly, according to the Register (UK),[3][4] teenagers and unemployed persons.[5] Increasingly, Wikipedia is edited by paid PR agents on behalf of their clients. Wikipedia editors, unlike their counterparts at Conservapedia, are overwhelmingly liberal, young males[6] — a demographic associated with self-centered belief systems and behavior.

Wikipedia was founded by atheist libertarian objectivist Jimmy Wales and atheist philosophy professor Larry Sanger. The website was born out of expert-written project Nupedia as a way to collaborate on articles. Nonetheless, Wikipedia overtook Nupedia and became an independent project hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, which also hosts related websites including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, and Wikinews. An irony of internet history is that Jimmy Wales, despite being an atheist, refers to himself as Wikipedia's "spiritual leader."[7]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Wikipedia

9 posted on 07/25/2014 10:38:32 PM PDT by preacher (I am not a global warming hoax denier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
They'll just read something into our out of the official record as they see fit, like speeches the record includes with those made on the floor when they were really handed to the clerk for inclusion in the record.

Then they can refer to the official record and edit Wikipedia to match it.

10 posted on 07/25/2014 11:07:19 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
over 9,000 staffers in the House

NASA, we have a problem.

11 posted on 07/25/2014 11:52:12 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Sorry, that should be: “Houston, we have a problem.”


12 posted on 07/25/2014 11:53:05 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

NO AMERICA, WE HAVE A PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!!


13 posted on 07/26/2014 12:14:42 AM PDT by mabarker1 (Please, Somebody Impeach the kenyan!!!! Once again dingy hairball, STFU!!! You corrupt POS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson