Posted on 07/23/2014 1:32:40 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s daughter is living with a Dutch boyfriend in the Netherlands as the country reels from last week’s jetliner missile attack by Ukrainian rebels with Russian-supplied weapons, according to reports Wednesday.
Outrage over Maria Putin’s presence in the grief-stricken country — which lost 193 citizens aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 — is fueling calls for her deportation, The Guardian reported.
Ukrainians living in the Netherlands are also planning a protest outside Maria’s apartment in the wealthy suburb of Voorschoten, outside The Hague, according to De Telegraaf newspaper.
Pieter Broertjes, mayor of the city of Hilversum, demanded the ouster of Maria, 29, during a radio interview Wednesday, as the country held a day of mourning and church bells tolled to announce the arival of the first bodies from Thursday’s plane crash.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
I’m not “some guy on the Internet” like we’re at Topix or Disqus or Twitter, I’m a poster of 23,284 threads on a site we’ve both been on for nearly 10 years. Right?
If she's a foreign national and not a Dutch citizen then she's staying there at the discretion of her host country, Holland. If the Dutch want to kick her out it is their right. Some people trying to enter the USA are barred at the border and no reason is ever given to them. All it takes is for the host country to consider them undesirable.
NWO is desparate to take over Ukraine and advance towards Moscow in a 'bloodless coup'. That's how the Russians see it. Too bad no one in the west has figured it out.
But But look at what the one with the most has to feed.
well they are quite liberal over there so no telling what they might do to her.
Send her home on Maylasian Air.
Sure you are, just a guy on the internet that suddenly claimed that George W. was CIA and when called on it, it seems that he just blurted it out for no reason, and won’t retract it.
Why not take this opportunity for us to rewrite the history of George W Bush, the unknown CIA man?
This could be a huge freerepublic scoop.
Before I said anything you also thought that his father was just snatched out of the blue, with no prior experience, to head the CIA, didn’t you?
Don’t be silly.
Rather than getting goofier and childish, show the world what you are trying to tell them about the two term president of the United States, that he was CIA, and no one but the internet guy knows it and it has now been revealed on this thread.
What is one of the prime tenets of an intelligence agency? That’s right, secrecy. They didn’t put out ads that Bush senior and junior were operatives. Not how it’s done. Just as we wouldn’t know that game show host & producer (The Gong Show and The Dating Game) Chuck Barris was a CIA assassin unless he spilled the beans in a drunken stupor.
LOL, you want to rewrite history and your proof is zero?
Quit digging a hole.
Well, as you put it, you’re just some “Internet guy” so I don’t have to prove anything to you. I’ve always got along with you here before this, as far as I can tell, so let’s just write it off as a difference of opinion. Whether or not a certain official was once in the CIA or not is not going to ruin my dinner, will it ruin yours? LOL
This isn’t a “difference of opinion”, you are claiming a major new historical fact about our last republican president.
You are being called on your claim, what has become clear is that you created this all in your head, yet you want to continue passing it off as real and factual.
Next time you’re in DC ask some people on the QT. You’ll be surprised I bet. And what difference does it make that he was a Republican? So was his father and even most historians will admit that DCI was not his first job at the CIA...
Amazing, you lied about George W. and while having no evidence at all for this historical bomb shell, you want to just keep repeating the claim.
At this point, we can see that it is just a bizarre lie created in your head.
Who is we? Do you have a hamster in your pocket or do seriously think you speak for everyone on this site?
Every sane person reading your posts, yesterday, out of the blue, you tried to create a fake new historical fact about George W., that he was CIA, and since then you have revealed that it is all fantasy.
As we go into the second day of your meaningless nonsense, we can conclude that you are just lying.
On this thread you made two overly exuberant posts, the other gave the impression you saw combat against the Soviet Union and North Korea by claiming you “fought” them.
Are you drinking this week, or something?
A) I’ve frequently been on the DMZ in Korea where small-scale fighting was still taking place whilst I was there (two tours) and (B) I fought against the Soviet Union by delivering up-to-date analysis to my superiors, who used that to brief both President Carter and President Reagan. I also wrote the twice-a-day “DMZ Report” that went straight to the president, secretary of defense, service secretaries, Joint Chiefs of Staff and many other top-level officials, including the DCI. I never claimed to engage in hand-to-hand combat with either enemy. I wouldn’t have, except in the most extreme circumstances. That was not my job in the Army. I was an intelligence analyst with every clearance a soldier at my pay grade could have. I don’t know what you did in the service or if you ever were in, but I sure as hell know what I did.
“”Dang man. I opposed and fought the Russians and North Koreans during the so-called “cold war”””
So like most of us during the Cold War, you opposed, rather than “opposed” and “fought”.
Your two overly exuberant claims, the other one stating that George W. was CIA, should have been simply retreated from, not dealt with as you are trying to.
Agree. She had nothing to do with it, and if we ignore our own moral compass, where are we then?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.