If it were me stalking you I would be jumping into your dialog
with others. No, that is your MO. Your typical boorish behavior
causes me to avoid you. All I ask is that you treat me likewise.
You won’t have to worry about “personal attacks” if you don’t
respond to my dialog with other posters. Your post #32 wasn’t
even germaine to my prior post about the agricultural worthiness
of California, anyway. You stuck your nose in it most likely because
I invoked “Texas” even though I wasn’t being critical. BTW, I
try to keep my criticisms central to liberalism. Little good comes
from painting everyone from one place with the same broad brush.
Many good conservatives in CA. I could appreciate what posters like
you do if you would take your act to lib sites. But you like to pick
fights w/those who you should be treating like allies.
Well, let’s try this again then and see if we can get you off the personal and onto the thread.
When someone posted this early in the thread about drug farming in California using up valuable resources.:
To: george76
One has to love the fact that California will soon become either a third world country...or if they’re lucky...a below sea level part of the Pacific following the big one.
At least the latter possibility will eliminate the drought problem.
4 posted on 7/23/2014 8:12:07 AM by Da Coyote
You posted this:
To: Da Coyote
A third world country?
Yah, a third world country that produces twice the agricultural output
as Texas, the next leading agricultural state in the nation. That doesn’t
seem to say much for the rest of the country.
12 posted on 7/23/2014 8:26:30 AM by Sivad
And then I posted this very relevant, but simple post in response to yours:
To: Sivad
California only became democrat a couple of decades ago, it takes a while to bring down what used to be, give it some time.
32 posted on 7/23/2014 10:18:11 AM by ansel12
Now would you care to respond to my post 32, or is obviously true and there is nothing really to say?