Posted on 07/22/2014 5:11:38 AM PDT by cotton1706
>>single party states are SO much more efficient at carrying out “the will of the people” (aka mob rule)
Massachusetts (where I live). I am unenrolled in either party so I admittedly can help choose a candidate in either party by requesting a Rep. or Dem. ballot—that seems to pose problems, though.. people who might really be on “one side” can help to choose the candidates on the other, as long as they’re unenrolled and can pick one ballot or the other in primaries.
In 2004 I got to vote against Kerry twice (in the primary I picked, ugh, John Edwards...) In the 6th Cong District I can vote against Dem. John Tierney twice—assuming he wins the primary which he prob will
For some reason libs - or marxists in this case - are great at taking tests.
Were their primaries when the Senate was elected by the States? Maybe we should go back to that system if Chuckie is so worried about primaries.
“Why the government would be in any way involved in choosing a political party’s candidate is way beyond me.”
The House of Lords wants to choose its own members. They don’t want the people involved.
Chuck prefers that the candidates be selected from a “qualified” list by the Leftist media-party, before the masses are allowed to pick between the red colored dog crap or the blue colored dog crap.
The Dems now have added this mantra about protecting the ability to govern into their lexicon. What it really means is that they resent the peoples’ ability to put checks on their actions.
Anything scumbag Schumer suggests is NOT for your benefit, it’s for his.
“Nonpartisan elections” gave us Mayor Anise Porker (Parker) in Houston who ramrodded through a sexual predator protection ordnance to allow trannies and predators to pick their bathrooms - and prey on your kids. Houstonians OVERWHELMINGLY oppose it. They give us communists self-described as moderates. They allow donors to hide behind their favored candidate’s “non partisan” status.
FOAD, Schumer.
They don’t want opponents. They want to be ordained and crowned like Obama. So it is said, so it shall be.
We already have a one party system. Whats his point?
We're pretty much there now.
No one except for Zero has advocated for more harm to the public than Schumer, and in a saner world he’d have to explain himself to the FBI.
Translation: Elections are a menace to the ruling class.
Or elections, or anything else you can cheat at.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.