[alloysteel]

Well, I suppose a little negative reinforcement, much like the methods used to “deprogram” homosexuals, could be applied.

By using aversion therapy, the subject can learn/be conditioned into stopping some “undesirable” behavior, but when used to deprogram sexual deviancy, it is supposed to be a “bad thing”.

The path recommended by the self-styled authorities is for the individual to “want” to change. Kind of flies in the face of “voluntary” and “free will”, now doesn’t it?

[Mycroft Holmes]

By using aversion therapy, the subject can learn/be conditioned into stopping some “undesirable” behavior

---

With cheap cameras and processors it isn't hard to envision a sort of human "shock collar" capable of determining undesirable behaviors and dealing out instant justice. Heaven help us.

	Freedom ≠ Free Stuff☭
	I, for one, welcome our new Cybernetic Overlords /.
Mash Dobbshead® for HTML, bop Hello_Cthlhu for XAMPP

[rktman]

Ah, you forget that gayness is the new “in” thing. Odd how 3% or less of the population has the power to control (or try) the other 97% ain’t it. Any way, the “voluntary” thing reminds me of community service crap. At one time folks were sentenced to it for minor crimes. Now it’s “mandatory” at a lot of schools in order to graduate. HUH? Let’s see, you’re required to volunteer for community service. Yeah, that makes sense. Like “giving back” and “paying it forward”. How about just helping out cause it’s the right/christian thing to do.