Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz declines to follow Palin’s lead in calling for Obama’s impeachment
Hot Air ^ | July 9, 2014 | Allahpundit

Posted on 07/09/2014 9:53:49 PM PDT by Bratch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 last
To: Bratch

“Never strike a king unless you are sure you shall kill him.”


141 posted on 07/10/2014 8:50:03 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #142 Removed by Moderator

To: Bratch
I disagreed with Sarah's statement calling for impeachment the moment I read it. It would be unsuccessful. It would die a unspectacular death in the senate while at the same time actually stimulating the Dem base to turn out in droves in the upcoming election in defense of its benevolent Messiah (no matter what he's guilty of)

There's a time for everything, and the time for impeachment is not at this precise moment.

And there's other ways (with more chances of success) to skin a rat.

Leni

143 posted on 07/10/2014 8:57:54 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Yea see those ‘long term consequenses’ were pretty far from the collective GOP mind when they pushed for lesser evil. Because ‘long term’ they added up to a party too gutless to impeach, filled with people too gutless to admit what they are. Moderates at best.

I think it’s awfully entertaining how a certain same old same old group of posters here hit all these threads with excuse after excuse covering for the ‘strategy’ of letting Obama retain power and not using the Constitution to strip him of his office.

Who came up with that ‘strategy’? Saul Alynski, Cloward or Piven? Ayres perhaps? Or was it a collective DNC contribution?


144 posted on 07/10/2014 9:03:47 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
You want to destroy the Republican Party.

I, on the other hand, while angry with the GOP over Mississippi and other issues, realize an important point:

NO political party will ever be perfect, as all political parties will consist of human beings, with egos, pride, ambition, cowardice and all the other human faults.

In truth, pushing for a “3rd Party” as you and your buddies want, will only make YOU compromise more and more with worthless or even damaging candidates. If your goal is to harm the GOP, you do not care if you win or lose an election as long at the Republicans take one on the chin.

This is suicide and it accomplishes nothing.

AS for your other worn out refrain? This country would be FAR worse off if not for conservatives like me within the Republican Party who have been fighting the good fight for years and years.

The “lesser of evils” strategy is the ONLY strategy, as well fall short of the Glory of God.

NO candidate will ever be perfect.

Every strategy has risks and rewards.

The risk of impeachment now is far, far higher than the “reward” of Joe Biden, perhaps, being POTUS.

145 posted on 07/10/2014 9:20:35 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Obviously you have no idea what conservatism is about. But you have situational ethics down cold.

Thanks for clarifying your position on lesser evil. I think you are doing Roof hits with Barry with a position that ludicrous but in all seriousness I admire the fact you are willing to state what you believe so the rest of us don’t waste any more time than needed to refute it.


146 posted on 07/10/2014 9:34:31 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

You have refuted nothing at all.
You have no leaders.
You have no followers to speak of.
You are basically alone in your views.

Smart conservatives want to defeat liberals.

Egotistical “conservatives” want to beat their chests.


147 posted on 07/10/2014 9:37:58 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Obviously you have no idea what conservatism is about. But you have situational ethics down cold.

Thanks for clarifying your position on lesser evil. I think you are doing Roof hits with Barry with a position that ludicrous but in all seriousness I admire the fact you are willing to state what you believe so the rest of us don’t waste any more time than needed to refute it.


148 posted on 07/10/2014 5:43:54 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

You are absolutely correct. They used to be called ‘fair weather’ friends (substitute Republicans for friends). They have the act of sticking a wet finger up in the air to gauge who and/or what to support based on which way the political winds are blowing.


149 posted on 07/11/2014 3:49:39 PM PDT by Ron H. (Are you ready for His return! Are you prepared?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson