Posted on 07/08/2014 6:47:52 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
YES 72.2% (137,924 votes)
NO 12.98% (24,803 votes)
NOT NOW 14.82% (28,308 votes)
Total Votes: 191,035
This is a real mess we’ve gotten ourselves into by letting it go this far.
0bama is blatantly breaking the law by supporting terrorists (Libya, Egypt, & Syria- at the least) AND the ones coming into our Southern border. PLUS he is fomenting & aiding a foreign invasion that undermines the local & national security *whether he “means to” or not*. Think the left’s claims of “compassion” will matter when women & kids are being raped, tortured, & murdered on American streets like they are in Mexico? And the gang & cartel battles where innocent people get gunned down or blown up make the “Wild West” look like Sunday School? BULL!
We (the politically aware) are disgusted by the complicity of the GOPe. Ordinary people (who aren’t so much aware) only know that things get worse day by day, year after year & “nobody does anything”. Which they don’t. THAT will hurt America the most in November because many people won’t even bother to vote.
Imho, I wish our military would just step up & put a stop to this. While we’re quaking in fear (Fear comes from the devil) that the commies are going to chimp out if we stop going along, they’re bringing in seasoned violent criminals with bioweapons on board as reinforcements by the hundreds of thousands & moving them all over the country. How is our military going to deal with that? (plus 0bama’s well armed “bureaucracies”)
I’m not worried about “undocumented democrat voters”. I’m worried about violent revolutionaries with a well honed taste for blood & their leaders- who are supposed to be America’s leaders, at the top of it.
And you should be, too. Because this hasn’t been about “politics” for a long time.
I’d bet there are more than a few undeclared “conservatives” participating in this poll.
You are 100% correct!!! It is the Democrats that must be made to force Obama to resign or impeach him. If the Republicans tried it and lost in the Senate....it would be a major mistake!!! Pubbies need to take the Seante and keep the House and...then chip away at Obama at every moment, destroying him, politically over time. He already is a full time “Lame Duck”, POTUS!!!
Actually....the Democrat Party should broom (Force Resign/Impeach) Obama under the bus, like right now!!! Failure to do so, immediately will literally devastate the Democrat Party, come November 4, 2014!!! It will take the Dems many years to recover from the political spanking they are about to receive!!!
Agree totally.
I was in DC on May 16 for the “American Spring”. It was silent. It was clear there is a division within that element and many were warned away.
I did see FEMA badges on the mall that day. There were obvious Agi Prop elements pretending to be “Patriots”.
I spent that Friday afternoon on the National Mall. Did not go back on Sunday. But I stayed in DC area until the following Sunday for the Rolling Thunder beginning.
In my opinion, the resistance will be at the State Level. It is already clear in Texas.
If the truth of this subversion is revealed, the trials will make The Nuremberg trials look like a small event.
Agree.
Let me guess, skin color would probably factor into how you would determine this.
I know it's unpopular around here,
Yes it is, after all, this is a PRO-LIFE forum...not Stormfront.
I think it's time to consider linking contraception to receipt of government benefits and maybe even providing contraception to teens in schools where a parental presence is lacking.
Is this your way of saying, "Three generations of imbeciles is enough"?
Looks like we have a eugenicist on this forum.
Let’s think about the premise that a person who is receiving money from the government also needs permission from the government to have children.
What about government employees? Per capita, they receive much more than welfare beneficiaries. They are highly motivated to support the expansion of government spending and control, for their own benefit. And, while many are honest, hardworking, and qualified in their line of work, even those people are often doing jobs that have no constitutional sanction and actively harm the country: the entire Department of Education, for example.
What about military personnel? Shouldn’t they need permission to become mothers or fathers?
Farmers, for example, need soldiers to protect the territory they farm. Oilmen need soldiers to protect oil wells and petroleum resources, resources that also in part are used by the farmer to grow food. To pay for this protection, taxes are levied on the farmer and oilman which are given to soldiers who then bring that money back to the farmer in exchange for food.
It's a cooperative effort, with contributions from many.
The trouble with the cycle of WIC and other programs is that too many of those receiving this assistance aren't contributing to the same degree as the farmer, oilman, or soldier, yet they and their children require the food and protection given by others with little certainty that their own children in adulthood will not also require assistance.
This has nothing to do with genetics and the idea that genetics should inform decisions about contraception and abortion. Eugenicists believe they know, a priori, who should have families and who should not.
That's a different position from that of saying that individuals not in a position to take on family responsibilities should not have children.
Anyone that can't afford children probably shouldn't have children.
Boehner disagrees with Palin on impeaching Obama
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/07/09/boehner-disagrees-with-palin-on-impeaching-obama/
NOBODY was talking about eugenics.
Eugenicists believe they know, a priori, who should have families and who should not.
Yes, and you have proposed this very thing.
That's a different position from that of saying that individuals not in a position to take on family responsibilities should not have children.
That's fine to say, but you wanted to MANDATE who could and could not have children.
Oh I get it. You think it’s only “them blacks” that receive government benefits and have children they can’t afford.
No, I've been asking you to explain yourself all afternoon.
You haven't done so.
Now you sound like a feminist objecting to the Hobby Lobby decision.
Predicating public assistance on the use of contraception is not the same thing as saying people can't have children.
People can still have those children but they shouldn't expect someone else to support them.
Maybe they do, maybe they don't. I agree that a soldier is contributing to the country ... but what about the civilian DoD GS-13 who's training the soldiers to be sensitive to sodomites and cross-dressers? What about Major Nidal Hassan and the cohorts who ignored his open threats to our country? What's their value?
What's Valerie Jarrett's value to the country?
Have you ever seen a list of your county's or school district's employees, with their salaries? I have. I don't believe I should have to pay to support their children.
Why “Republicans”? Shouldn’t it say the House and Senate.
Obama is Violating the Constitution of the United States, not the “Republican” Constitution.
He can’t. It would require him to expose his liberal beliefs.
A retread, no doubt.
Really? You are accusing ME of sounding like the feminists who oppose Hobby Lobby? I've been called a lot of things on here, but hearing that I'm supporting the feminist pro-abortion agenda is certainly a new one.
Predicating public assistance on the use of contraception is not the same thing as saying people can't have children.
EVERY argument eugenicists has included an assurance that it wasn't going to be as bad as their opponents said. They say things like it will be "safe and legal and rare."
Ultimately, the result is always MUCH WORSE than what the opponents of the eugenicists feared.
Don't despair though, you've basically gotten your way all along. Big Murder places their abortuaries almost exclusively in poor, inner city areas. The poor and minorities are far more likely to murder their babies than more white and more affluent women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.