Posted on 07/09/2014 9:44:31 AM PDT by wagglebee
They call it a “Mean-spirited, anti-women agenda.” And they say it’s “Playing ping-pong politics with women’s lives,” “Out of touch,” and “Inconsistent with U.S. policy.”
And that’s just in the headlines!
So just what is this “mean-spirited” Mexico City Policy? Put simply, it prohibits US taxpayer dollars from going to organizations which “promote or perform abortions” as a part of “population planning activities or other population assistance.”
What could be wrong with that? It’s a sensible policy, first put in place in 1986 under President Reagan, and which is supported by a majority of Americans. The fact is a substantial majority of Americans oppose using taxpayer money to fund abortions at home and certainly do not want to export it abroad.
Not so the population control lobbyists, however. They believe that they have a duty, no less than a right, to promote abortion everywhere in the world, especially where it is illegal. This is why they call the Mexico City Policy a “Global Gag Rule.” It “gags” them, preventing them from using U.S. taxpayer dollars to try and overturn existing pro-life laws in Africa and Latin America.
It also bars them from using U.S. taxpayer dollars to actually perform illegal abortions overseas. This infuriates them because they believe that abortion is a “woman’s right” regardless of what the local laws say.
Finally, they are convinced that abortion is necessary to control population growth and to save women from dying in childbirth. That is why they accuse pro-lifers of “killing women in the name of partisan politics.” (Never mind that the actual legislation contains a “life of the mother” exception; these people are not troubled by mere facts.)
There are multiple problems with the Obama administration’s policy of promoting and performing abortions everywhere in the developing world. Firstly, this undermines our efforts to promote democracy and human rights. While the Senate version of the bill contains a pro forma prohibition on lobbying (“none of the funds made available under this act may be used to lobby for or against abortion”), the efforts of International Planned Parenthood Federation and other U.S.-funded population control groups to legalize abortion in country after country are well-known and will continue--prohibition or no prohibition.
Such efforts not only violate local laws, they undermine our foreign relations. It creates a very bad impression when the United States, in conjunction with the major colonial powers, tells countries only recently freed from colonial domination that they should abort a good percentage of the next generation. Pushing abortion on underdeveloped nations through “population planning” programs only serves to remind their citizens of their not-so-distant past as conquered peoples.
Last year, a young Nigerian woman wrote a passionate plea to U.S. pro-lifers complaining about the programs of our government:
“We are thirsty and they give us condoms! We are hungry and they offer us contraceptive pills! We are sick and they offer us the most modern techniques of abortion! We are naked and they lead us into the arms of sexual hedonism! We are imprisoned by poverty and they offer us sexual liberation!!! Silent tears roll down for Africa in a modern world that can neither see our pain nor hear our cry for help.”
She was spot on. The Obama administration is more interested in aborting the thirsty, sterilizing the hungry, and contracepting the naked than engaging in true charity. It is more interested in funding its abortion-minded U.S. partners (in return for votes and campaign contributions) than in actually helping people on foreign shores.
Reinstituting the Mexico City Policy would not stop all of this abuse and corruption, but it would be a start. It would protect women from the worst excesses of population control efforts and help to salvage our country’s image around the world.
Let your Congressman and Senator know that you support the Mexico City Policy. It will save lives.
* The House version of the bill, H.R. 5013, can be found here: https://beta.congress.gov/113/bills/hr5013/BILLS-113hr5013rh.pdf
* The Senate version of the bill, S 2499 can be found here: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-113s2499pcs/pdf/BILLS-113s2499pcs.pdf
Reprinted with permission from Pop.org.
NOTHING is more important to Obama and the left than abortion.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Aren’t thirst and hunger God’s way of controlling population?
What SPECIFICALLY are you trying to say?
No.
Matthew 7:9-11
9 “Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? 10 Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11 If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!
You don't know much about God, do you.
God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it.
God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it.
...and by bus, crossing the Rio Grande...
And what EXACTLY does illegal immigration have to do with population control?
“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.” Abe Lincoln
If you can get him to be serious and answer that's great.
He may not have a point, but I'm fairly certain he has an agenda.
If you can get him to be serious and answer that's great.
I have a pretty good idea why he's not answering.
I don’t suffer fools gladly and will make no apology for it.
Nor do I, I want to determine what this fool is trying to push and then deal with it.
After reading some of his previous posts, it’s clear to me as well.
He’s probably a retread and knows better than to answer seriously.
Yep, I see it too. I figured he was a eugenicist. I assume he's either a retread or one of the other trolls told him not to answer me.
His screen name is pretty interesting as well, I guess he determined that "stormfrontchat" probably would't fly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.