Posted on 07/01/2014 9:19:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Given how much evil there is in the world, given how many signs of moral, intellectual, and economic decline there are here in America; and given the increasing irrelevance of America to world events, it is fair to ask why the American Left is preoccupied with the name Washington “Redskins.”
The Washington Redskins have been in existence for 82 years. For about 80 of those years, virtually no one, including the vast majority of American Indians, was troubled by the name. Yet it is now of such importance to the American Left that the majority leader of the United States Senate has repeatedly demanded, from the floor of the Senate, that the team drop its name; 50 U.S. senators, all of them Democrats, have signed an open letter demanding the same; Sports Illustrated’s Peter King no longer uses the name; other leading sportswriters have adopted the same practice; and the president of the United States has weighed in on the issue.
The pressure is relentless. There is more concern in the pages of the Washington Post and the New York Times — not to mention the rest of the Left — with the Redskins than with the fact that the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative groups for investigation, one of its division heads pleaded the Fifth Amendment before Congress, and the agency claims it lost all relevant e-mails and hard drives.
The angry will tell you that the name “Redskins” is profoundly offensive to American Indians and that they — the angry — are simply more sensitive to racial slurs than others are. This explanation is self-serving but insufficient.
The great majority of American Indians understandably just don’t care. Like heterosexual AIDS and so many other crises, this has been entirely manufactured by the Left. Since 1947, there has been a movie theater, the Redskin Theatre (with the same logo as the football team), in Anadarko, Okla., a city whose population is divided evenly between Indians and whites and that calls itself the “Indian Capital of the Nation.” Why, in 67 years, have the Indian populations of Anadarko and Oklahoma not changed this theater’s name? Because the Left hadn’t made it an issue. It’s not an Indian issue; it’s a left-wing issue.
And why is the Left so preoccupied? It isn’t because they are more morally sensitive to injustice. That is what the Left believes about itself. But there are other reasons for the manufactured hysteria about the Redskins name. Here are some:
First, there is a rule in life: Those who do not confront the greatest evils will confront much lesser evils or simply manufacture alleged evils that they then confront. This has been a dominant characteristic of the Left for at least half a century.
The greatest evils since World War II have been communism and, since the demise of communism in the Soviet Union and in most other communist countries, violent Islam — or, as it often is called, Islamism. Islamism is the belief that sharia (Islamic law) must be imposed wherever possible on a society, beginning, of course, with Muslim-majority countries. These Islamists are, as the British historian Andrew Roberts has noted, the fourth incarnation of fascism — first there was fascism, then Nazism, then communism, and now Islamism.
For many years most of the Western Left was supportive of communism, and after the 1960s, it was simply hostile to anti-communists. The Left was far more concerned with attacking America than with attacking the Soviet Union. So, too, today, the Left is far more concerned with attacking America — its alleged racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, and economic inequality — than with fighting Islamism.
Second, the corollary to the above is that those who do not fight the greatest evils invariably loathe those who do. The Left hated American anti-communists much more than it hated communists. The Left today hates traditional America much more than it hates traditional Islamists. The Redskins name is a symbol of that hated America.
Third, the Left has huge nostalgia for the Sixties. In the Left’s eyes, virtually every one of its causes is as morally urgent as the civil-rights battles on behalf of blacks (for which it falsely claims exclusive credit). Therefore getting the Redskins to change their name is a contemporary expression of working to give blacks full voting rights.
Fourth, aside from tearing down another American tradition, and showing how awful America was and remains, the motivating issue here is left-wing self-esteem. Remember it was the Left that developed the self-esteem movement. And nobody feels as good about himself as the Left does when it finds another American moral flaw, especially when that flaw is another example of “intolerance” and racism.
Fifth, and finally, the Left is totalitarian at heart. Whenever possible it seeks control of others, and it loves to throw its considerable weight around. The left-wing president does it so often that the Supreme Court has unanimously shot down his attempts on a dozen occasions. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, under huge pressure from leftists, just dropped conservative Pulitzer Prize–winning columnist George Will. Under pressure from left-wing professors and students, Brandeis and other universities dropped the few conservative speakers they had invited to this year’s commencement exercises. Coercing the Redskins to do their will is only the Left’s latest attempt to force its views on the vast majority of its fellow citizens. That’s why it’s worth fighting for the Redskins. Today it’s the Redskins; tomorrow it’s you.
— Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist. His most recent book is Still the Best Hope: Why the World Needs American Values to Triumph. He is the founder of Prager University
They care because the owner is among the 1% and donated to Republicans.
Yo! Prager!
They care because it advances their statist (big government) ideology wherein no individual can be fully-self-deteriminate without the help of the “party”.
Let’s look back at the CCCP.
A great read and right on. Bravo to Mr. Prager.
“Redskins on the Brain: If most American Indians don’t even care, why does the Left?”
Easy. It’s a “wedge issue” that distracts from things that actually matter.
Democrats ‘care’ because they’re thin skinned little dream queens who want to stomp their feet about something....
control over society, thoughts, expression, culture
It's nothing to do with a name, but everything to do with keeping the mind unsettled.
Christians really DO have a handle on love and peace, but our enemies .. the world, the flesh and the devil .. don't want us to have them ... so they're always throwing stuff at us.
The principle of keeping your adversary off-guard and/or occupied is ages old.
Everything the left throws at America is not to fix or correct anything, but to cause KOS and confusion
(I always wanted to inject the correct pronunciation of those three letters somewhere)
They care because by empowering political correctness gives them a tool with which to shut down the 1st Amendment rights (speech and press) of those who oppose them.
Just for the record I bought a can of redskin peanuts today. No one cared.
Me too. The difference is, they want 1968. I want 1960.
It’s the same mentality that was outraged over the circus clown and the Swiss store clerk.
They are convinced in what passes for their minds that all Whites are racist, and that the whole country is racist and will never stop being racist.
They just have more feeeeeeeeeelings than the rest of us, and they know what’s right.
If you don’t agree, you’re a racist.
The Left loves attacking straw men. That is the only way they can win................
They’re more compassionate than even the people who are supposed to be offended and so they tell them “Don’t worry if you’re not offended, we’ll be offended for you.”
They care because they know that the majority of American
Indians who are not offended by the name “Redskin” are too
dumb to know they should be offended, and need to be
protected.
At least in their minds anyway.
Because it a weapon for instilling “white guilt” and “national guilt” in their drive to destroy western civilization.
There is nothing more offensive to Native America Indians than writing books with non-PC titles. I know this may sound offensive to some of you in FReepland, but I’ll just refer to it once for purposes of documentation: The book title “Pow Wow Chow” should be banned, taken off the market, burned, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.