Skip to comments.
Supreme Court: Yes, (some) corporations can pray--and you'll all pay
Los Angeles Times ^
| June 30, 2014
| by Michael Hiltzik
Posted on 06/30/2014 2:18:49 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
If the LA Times is upset with a SCOTUS decision, liberty prevailed.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Plainly, he felt Ginsburg's powerful intellect breathing down his neckThe smell must have been horrible.
2
posted on
06/30/2014 2:20:13 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ginsburg's powerful intellect breathing down his neckHas "intellect" become another name for halitosis?
3
posted on
06/30/2014 2:20:14 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
4
posted on
06/30/2014 2:20:54 PM PDT
by
Kenny
(<p)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Alito wins. Ginsberg loses. It is settled law.
5
posted on
06/30/2014 2:21:23 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
BARF Alert!
Transvestites can have surgeries on TAXPAYER money.
That is much more OBSCENE THAN THIS.
And then there is the case of the VA buying 1/2 BILLION dollars in SOLAR PANELS while VETERANS due to OBAMA incompetence...
6
posted on
06/30/2014 2:23:17 PM PDT
by
topher
(Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
No, we don’t want to pay, that is the point!
7
posted on
06/30/2014 2:23:30 PM PDT
by
GraceG
(No, My Initials are not A.B.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
[ Alito wins. Ginsberg loses. It is settled law. ]
It is only settled law if it comes out in favor of the liberals
8
posted on
06/30/2014 2:24:11 PM PDT
by
GraceG
(No, My Initials are not A.B.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
9
posted on
06/30/2014 2:25:55 PM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Hiltzik is a huge leftist, like practically everyone at the Times. I would discount anything he says on this issue.
10
posted on
06/30/2014 2:26:53 PM PDT
by
Deo volente
(God willing, America shall survive this Obamanation.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
For many years our health insurance plans did not include contraception and I don’t ever recall any hardship. With contraceptives now cheap and available everywhere without any stigma why is this such a problem???
To: GeronL
“Ginsburg’s powerful intellect”
If that “intellect” consists of agreeing with & repeating anything ever written by Eleanor Roosevelt, then it is to laugh.
12
posted on
06/30/2014 2:28:35 PM PDT
by
elcid1970
("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
And if they win, we'll pay, Actually, if the liberals win...we pay.
Gov't mandated that we must pay for these atrocious items. Liberal always force us to pay.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The LA Slimes unhappy?
Color me glad.
With a capital G.
To: GeronL
That’s where I quit reading, no time for stupidity like that.
15
posted on
06/30/2014 2:31:24 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Wow, liberals really do live in a fantasy world.
Ginsburg’s “powerful intellect”? I’ve been reading her opinions for many years now, and her reasoning could be described many ways... none of which include the terms “powerful intellect”. That’s even before she started sleeping through cases, and even before her court opinions started sounding like she was meandering her way towards some liberal shibboleth like a senile dementia patient shuffling around the retirement home.
To: Ray76
17
posted on
06/30/2014 2:32:36 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: BenLurkin
...Has “intellect” become another name for halitosis?...
Snort!
18
posted on
06/30/2014 2:32:52 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The LA Times mis-represented this as a decision against birth control being covered (which would be great). It's an anti-abortion decision.
I can only assume that since the error hasn't been corrected yet across the media that they're referring to the decision as withholding birth control to inflame passions.
Besides that, nobody is telling the affected employees that they can't have abortion-inducing medications. They'll have to pay for it themselves.
The media has become pathetic.
19
posted on
06/30/2014 2:34:54 PM PDT
by
grania
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“laws that apply to the rest of us, based on religious beliefs that can’t be objectively verified “
Kinda like Global Warming huh, LA times
20
posted on
06/30/2014 2:35:17 PM PDT
by
DanielRedfoot
(Creepy Ass Cracker)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson