Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vet Could Lose Home For Displaying Small US Flag In Front Yard
CBS Tampa ^

Posted on 06/27/2014 6:06:29 AM PDT by Enlightened1

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (CBS Tampa) – A veteran could lose his home because of a small American flag he has placed in a flower pot in front of his home.

(Excerpt) Read more at tampa.cbslocal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: display; fl; flag; florida; hoa; home; oldglory; vet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Then don’t buy into a housing area with a HOA. Simple.


21 posted on 06/27/2014 7:01:51 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
HOAs are evil. If you don't want to obey the rules of an evil HOA don't purchase property subject to an evil HOA. By purchasing property subject to an evil HOA you are saying you will obey the evil HOA. Did I mention that HOAs are evil?

Well said.

22 posted on 06/27/2014 7:08:30 AM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Except the homeowner has bank statements showing regular automatic withdrawals of the HOA fees.

So the scam is being perpetrated by the HOA. It appears to me that they have rewritten their flag rules after losing the first time in court, then used the new rules to levy fines against the homeowner, applied his auto deducts to the fines and are now claiming he hasn’t paid his contractual fees so that they can strip him of his ownership rights.

It’s a scam alright.


23 posted on 06/27/2014 7:25:58 AM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
The HOA needs to familiarize themselves with Florida Statutes and the homeowner needs to remind his lawyer of the following:

720.304 Right of owners to peaceably assemble; display of flag; SLAPP suits prohibited.

(2)(a) Any homeowner may display one portable, removable United States flag or official flag of the State of Florida in a respectful manner, and one portable, removable official flag, in a respectful manner, not larger than 41/2 feet by 6 feet, which represents the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard, or a POW-MIA flag, regardless of any covenants, restrictions, bylaws, rules, or requirements of the association.

(b) Any homeowner may erect a freestanding flagpole no more than 20 feet high on any portion of the homeowner’s real property, regardless of any covenants, restrictions, bylaws, rules, or requirements of the association, if the flagpole does not obstruct sightlines at intersections and is not erected within or upon an easement. The homeowner may further display in a respectful manner from that flagpole, regardless of any covenants, restrictions, bylaws, rules, or requirements of the association, one official United States flag, not larger than 41/2 feet by 6 feet, and may additionally display one official flag of the State of Florida or the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, or Coast Guard, or a POW-MIA flag. Such additional flag must be equal in size to or smaller than the United States flag. The flagpole and display are subject to all building codes, zoning setbacks, and other applicable governmental regulations, including, but not limited to, noise and lighting ordinances in the county or municipality in which the flagpole is erected and all setback and locational criteria contained in the governing documents.

(c) This subsection applies to all community development districts and homeowners’ associations, regardless of whether such homeowners’ associations are authorized to impose assessments that may become a lien on the parcel.

(3) Any owner prevented from exercising rights guaranteed by subsection (1) or subsection (2) may bring an action in the appropriate court of the county in which the alleged infringement occurred, and, upon favorable adjudication, the court shall enjoin the enforcement of any provision contained in any homeowners’ association document or rule that operates to deprive the owner of such rights.

end snip


24 posted on 06/27/2014 7:29:08 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

It is my understanding that an HOA can’t take the house, but they can prevent it from being sold/transferred to a new owner until the debt is settled. So, if this guy hasn’t paid his HOA fees, one it takes years to it to get to this stage and two he brought this upon himself for non-payment. Appears that it is not about the flag at all. If that were the case he could have switched it to a non American flag and then challenged them when and if they didn’t make him switch it.


25 posted on 06/27/2014 7:32:12 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
My son, the lawyer who knows everything, says there has never been a contract that couldn't be gotten out of.

Perhaps that is a good thing.

You who think this vet should lose his home over the stupidity of this are a bit draconian yourselves.

One really bad aspect of HOAs is that you MAY AGREE WITH PRESENT RULES, BUT THEY CAN CHANGE AT THE NEXT HOA MEETING.

My mother had a Lauderdale condo on the ocean, and when she bought it owner's could rent out seasonally, as that didn't cause too much coming and going of new people. But the owners who lived there year round changed it to no rental, period. My mother, on a very small fixed income needed to rent seasonally, was out of luck and had to sell.

vaudine

26 posted on 06/27/2014 7:36:53 AM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vaudine
My son, the lawyer who knows everything, says there has never been a contract that couldn't be gotten out of.

Unless it is by mutual agreement, this is what is wrong with our country. If we can't rely on each other's word (a contract) we are done as a civilization.

Is your son a defense attorney, but any chance?

27 posted on 06/27/2014 7:43:56 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fwdude; vaudine

“Is your son a defense attorney, but any chance? “

Or a democrat? (I know, I know. . .)


28 posted on 06/27/2014 7:53:14 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

ANYONE who buys a home under a homeowners association has got to be a gluten for punishment. These association’s are run by little tin dictators who wallow in their own self importance and expect to be catered to and fawned over or you are on their shi* list.


29 posted on 06/27/2014 8:06:02 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

We once lived in a bedroom community where all but two neighborhoods had HOAs.

They started as HOA neighborhoods, but the residents voted them out.


30 posted on 06/27/2014 8:20:39 AM PDT by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
We walked away from a couple of properties because I wasn't going to get myself in that position.

We told our agent we didn't even want to look at houses with HOAs.

It is getting harder and harder to find new houses that don't have them. You can't even buy a new house in the town I live in without having to sign away your right to free association.

 

31 posted on 06/27/2014 8:31:00 AM PDT by zeugma (It is time for us to start playing cowboys and muslims for real now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
The secret is relying on each others word. So many companies have such long wordy contracts that the average person goes cross eyed and glazed trying to read and end up relying on exactly what you say must be in effect--relying on the other's word. Or they must have a lawyer to read everything they sign.

Therefore, there are MANY unreasonable conditions set out in many contracts that are CHANGED from what has been SAID by only one word or small phrase. So although you may think caveat emptor always applies, as a matter of simple fact, it cannot always.

To say an unwary person must comply with the unreasonable because they signed on the dotted line is to give all the breaks to unscrupulous business people.

vaudine

32 posted on 06/27/2014 8:49:59 AM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
He handles most everything except real estate sales. At one time he did those almost exclusively, but took so much time and keeping up with new regs, etc. he gave it up in order to do more of a variety.

He is an excellent defense lawyer. I facetiously say "he knows everything", because sometimes he gets a little pompous and acts like he does. As his mother, it is my job to let him know when he acts that way.

vaudine

33 posted on 06/27/2014 8:54:41 AM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59

He did pay his fees and can prove it. The HOA is applying his fees towards the fines they imposed for his alleged violations of HOA rules regarding the flag flying.

So it is kinda about the flag, but really about power. The HOA is trying to pull a fast one. If state law trumps HOA rules, then the fines are specious. Whoever runs the HOA just wants to force the guy out for challenging their authority. I suspect they are trying the unpaid fees ploy to distract voting HOA members because the only thing worse than a dictatorial HOA manager is a member who shirks the membership fees.


34 posted on 06/27/2014 9:01:52 AM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: vaudine
To say an unwary person must comply with the unreasonable because they signed on the dotted line is to give all the breaks to unscrupulous business people.

Then that is an open license to invalidate any contract. Do we want that?

35 posted on 06/27/2014 9:06:56 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Yea, just private property rights are so 18th century. You own the property, you SHOULD be able to do anything you want. If not, then you don’t own squat.

HOA’s should be illegal.


36 posted on 06/27/2014 9:58:31 AM PDT by packrat35 (Pelosi is only on loan to the world from Satan. Hopefully he will soon want his baby killer back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc

Read this whole thread and you’ll find many of them here.


37 posted on 06/27/2014 10:02:21 AM PDT by packrat35 (Pelosi is only on loan to the world from Satan. Hopefully he will soon want his baby killer back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
No! Of course it is not a license to invalidate. If the contract was understood and perfectly explained, then it either stands or goes to negotiation.

If something has happened to the source of income of the buyer, and he/she can't pay, then something has to give--thus negotiations.

vaudine

38 posted on 06/27/2014 1:05:54 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: vaudine

Well, the negotiations are usually spelled out in the contract. In the case of a loss of income, usually a foreclosure on the home (after an extended time of due process - believe me.)


39 posted on 06/27/2014 1:17:33 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Around here the HOAs will not let you see the agreement until you are at the closing.

Make your offer subject to reviewing and approving the current HOA agreement during the attorney review. If the seller wants to sell, he will provide it.

40 posted on 06/27/2014 2:57:51 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson