Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Viennacon

But you still can’t prove who they voted for.


71 posted on 06/26/2014 3:02:12 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

Yes, because the picture that Kim posted from Hinds county has the results from the Democrat primary and the Republican runoff side by side. if they voted in the Democrat primary, they should not have been able to vote in the Republican runoff


78 posted on 06/26/2014 3:03:55 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

Yes, because the picture that Kim posted from Hinds county has the results from the Democrat primary and the Republican runoff side by side. if they voted in the Democrat primary, they should not have been able to vote in the Republican runoff


79 posted on 06/26/2014 3:03:55 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

Who they voted for is immaterial.

The point is that a voter who participates in one party’s primary is not, by law, allowed to vote in another party’s runoff.

That makes the Tuesday ballot of any such voter invalid, regardless of how it was marked. The vote doesn’t move from one candidate’s total to the other’s, but is thrown out.


94 posted on 06/26/2014 3:09:59 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson