Sarah Palin: ‘Waterboarding is how we’d baptize terrorists’ in her administration

The Washington Times ^ | April 26, 2016 | David Sherfinski

[jazusamo]

INDIANAPOLIS — Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin fired up a crowd of thousands inside Lucas Oil Stadium Saturday night to kick off the National Rifle Association’s “Stand and Fight Rally,” saying Americans’ constitutional rights as envisioned by the founding fathers are under attack and policies like gun-free zones constitute “stupid on steroids.”

“They knew that if the Second Amendment goes, the rest of the constitution is not far behind,” she said of the country’s founders.

In her approximately 12-minute address, Mrs. Palin also derided what she argued is akin to a ‘blame the messenger’ attitude on gun violence many Americans take today.

“Gun stores are an accomplice to crime,” she said, “and that fork made me fat.”

Mrs. Palin, plucked from relative political obscurity to be the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee, still enjoys significant support among elements of the party’s base, and was at times received like a rock star inside the complex adjacent to the Indiana Convention Center, where much of the gun rights group’s annual meeting has taken place.

[DoughtyOne]

This is so juvenile and third grade, that it’s not even worth rebutting.

Later...

[Lakeshark]

The humor in all this is the ever omniscient, ever incredibly intelligent, in his own eyes blue one truly is in a monkey trap, and it's a trap of his own making.

The man lies in front of the world about some mythical "position" Palin holds, then goes off to congratulate himself on fooling people he actually believes read his asinine drivel.

He's never linked us to someone who actually has an immigration position as he claims she has, can't convince ANYONE she isn't against illegal immigration and its enablers, and after KNOWING he's been pwned, KNOWING he's lying, has never MANNED UP ABOUT HOW WRONG HE HAS BEEN.

You're totally correct that he's destroyed his reputation long ago, totally correct in showing how his "talking points" are from the totalitarian left.

I can't wait for him to continue in this trap, responding like a fool with the same post, while his sad, tired attempts to bring down a conservative champion fail.

I love this trap, it's pure genius.......it's Breitbart's mirror held up for all to see: "Those on the right who didn't come to the defense of Sarah Palin while she was being savaged were simply eunuchs. Those who participated in the savaging are animals that have no souls." Breitbart had it pegged perfectly, his quote is a perfect mirror for the blue deceiver.

[Lakeshark]

I love it, he finally sees the trap he’s in, so now he’s going in to his basement to cry to mommy.

[DoughtyOne]

One Palin Supporter: LINK

It reaches the point where I can't fail to address it any longer, my growing guilt at drawing the both of you out, letting you reveal yourselves for what you truly are inside.

Look at this thread.  Nine days now, the two of you have been trying to cast me as the evil spawn of the devil.  This in reaction to my attempt to point out Palin's flawed immigration plan, and provide an opportunity for you and others to explain that it changed.  You could have linked me to a place where it reveals she no longer supports Registration and Remaining in Place.  Insults were all I received in return on this thread.  Hey, that's okay.  It tells me and others what at least two people think is reasoned in support of their candidate.  I tells me and others what at least two of you are willing to do in her name, to someone who merely begs the question.  Do you agree with the resultant damage Registering and allowing 20-35 million illegal immigrants to Remain in Place would cause this nation?

I remain fixed on the question.  You remain fixed on growing ever more wild in your objections.

Insults, lies, denigration, crudeness, vulgarity, vulgarity in direct connection to your candidate's name...  this is the true you.  Monkey trap?  This is your intellectual response to a person pointing out your candidate's policy, delivered in her own words in a public interview on FoxNews channel?

LakeShark, you stated that Palin only said this in support of John McCain, in her capacity as his running mate.  You obviously didn't agree with it, or you would have said, "Yes, and I agree with her plan."  It was objectionable and you know it.  So once I made it clear the plan was truly her plan two years after running with McCain, you suddenly grew silent on the issue.  And then after long silence on it, you tried to cast it off as something from four years ago.  You were the one who said she changed her mind.  I have asked you to provide a link to evidence of that, and you have refused to do it.  Either that or you can't do it, and have been caught in yet another falsehood.

There is no shame in either of you.  This is the level of intellect the two of you have progressed to in adult-hood, and that's the long and short of it.

It almost borders abuse drawing the both of you out, but then folks just as well know who they are dealing with.  I don't have to compare you to others.  It makes no difference that the Palestinians go the monkey route when talking about the Israelis.  You folks wouldn't grasp the significance of adopting their disinformation techniques.  The desparation of this act would be lost on you.  It probably wouldn't be on many others.

There is one good thing I will say about Palin.  She does not deserve the guilt of association you two would garner for her if your behavior were widely seen.  I believe her to be a decent person, someone I disagree with on at least one issue of policy.  I do not see her as a person that would act the way the two of you have, if someone disagreed with her.  She would accept the disagreement and move on as most adults would.

She certainly wouldn't behave as you two have.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

[Lakeshark]

Heh, heh.....he's still here, goaded by his pride, trapped with his hand in the cookie jar..........

Do you think he'll ever experience the shame of the Breitbart mirror?

I actually don't think he's man enough for that......

"Those on the right who didn't come to the defense of Sarah Palin while she was being savaged were simply eunuchs. Those who participated in the savaging are animals that have no souls." Andrew Breitbart, three weeks before he died. Speaking to the blue one from beyond the grave.

[DoughtyOne]

Once again, avoidence.  So, LakeShark, do you support Palin's plan to Register illegal aliens and let the Remain in place?

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

[kiryandil]

Lakeshark wrote: it's Breitbart's mirror held up for all to see: "Those on the right who didn't come to the defense of Sarah Palin while she was being savaged were simply eunuchs. Those who participated in the savaging are animals that have no souls."

Thanks for posting that quote.

It should serve to remind us that Tina Fey and the Left-wing scum who think like her can "see" Palin's imaginary "immigration policy" from their foetid California Commie swamps.

And that if foul excrement from the Left like "a failed half term governor" appears on Free Republic, we're not going to be eunuchs. We're going to slap it down as hard as we can.

And we're also going to slap down supposed "Freepers" who create "straw positions" and "straw policies" for conservative leaders that they dislike.

[kiryandil]

Heh, heh.....he's still here, goaded by his pride, trapped with his hand in the cookie jar..........

He won't let go of his little handful of rice - Palin's "imaginary immigration policy".

I imagine his wrist is getting pretty raw just about now.

Ya think maybe someone should tell him why he can't escape?

Pssssst! Unclench your mind from that 4-year-old O'Baxter interview, and read some new Palin thoughts on immigration!

;-)

[kiryandil]

Man.

DoughtyQueeg is fracking delusional:

DQ wrote:

She does not deserve the guilt of association you two would garner for her if your behavior were widely seen.

Ohnoes! Lakeshark, now lookit you & I have done! Sarah Palin is going to have to TOTALLY WITHDRAW from public life because of stuff you and I posted on the Interwebtubes!

Oh, woe is us! How could we have been so thoughtless?

Sarah is prolly looking at this thread RIGHT NOW, sinking into a deep depression because she knows that she's been sullied beyond redemption by two anonymous people that she doesn't even know are alive.

DQ wrote:

I believe her to be a decent person, someone I disagree with on at least one issue of policy.

So, DoughtyQueeg's "immigration policy" disagrees with the imaginary "immigration policy" that he so thoughtfully created for Sarah Palin.

Moar deep depression for Sarah.

The non-existent campaign staff for Sarah Palin's non-existent campaign are resigning in non-existent droves after reading the DoughtyQueeg's scathing missive on her non-existent "immigration policy"

So, DQ - do you take stupid pills, or what?

[DoughtyOne]

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Once again, avoidence.  Palin lays it out there, and you talk about anything but...

Do you approve of her stated immigration policy?  Perhaps you should listen to it again.

Do you agree with her policy as presented in this interview?  A simply yes or no will do.

Since you like talking about the Left so much, why not explain why her plan is different from the Left's plan, since both provide instant legalization for anyone who Registers.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

[kiryandil]

DoughtyQueeg wrote:

Do you approve of her stated immigration policy?

I have no opinion on your interpretation of this Sarah Palin interview.

Perhaps you should listen to it again.

I never listened to it in the first place. It's a 4-year-old interview with Bill O'Baxter, whose breath was smelling like Barack Obama's @ss 4 years ago.

BTW - have you retracted your DUmpster line from the beginning of this thread - "a failed half term governor"?

I thought not.

[DoughtyOne]

One Palin Supporter: LINK

In your mind I am delusional for listening to the woman herself state what her policy was over a period of at least two years.

In your mind I am also delusional because I won't succumb to the logic of a third grade Leftist mentality.  You're hopelessly flailing along without any real counter argument whatsoever.  You can only try desperately to misdirect, and ultimately fail.  Anyone who has spent any time at all over the last twenty-five years watching how the Left debates issues, will recognize a disciple in you.  Insult, name calling, vulgarity... it's patent Carville, Davis, Clinton, and others.

The woman wasn't held at gunpoint here.  She agreed to go on the Fox News program and explain her policy concerning Illegal Aliens.  I don't think she's a liar.  This was her plan.  What are your alternatives other than to admit this?  Oh yes, folks can get that answer at the link above.

Those antics aren't going to impress folks that you have the more logical fact based argument.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

[kiryandil]

Actually, it's Free Republic "old school" for dealing with Palin-slandering windbags like you.

Let go of the rice, monkey.

Your interpretation of a 4-year-old Sarah Palin interview is NOT an "official Palin policy", and your wife is NOT Morgan Fairchild.

[editor-surveyor]

Going to be hard to wipe the snicker off my mug after that one!

[DoughtyOne]

One Palin Supporter: LINK

DoughtyQueeg wrote:

First attempt to dismiss Palin's stated immigration policy, in this instance using insult...

Do you approve of her stated immigration policy?

I have no opinion on your interpretation of this Sarah Palin interview.

Second attempt to dismiss Palin's stated immigration policy, in this instance trying to lay it all off on my mistaken interpretation.  Folks can listen to it themselves and see if I have mischaracterized her comments.

Perhaps you should listen to it again.

I never listened to it in the first place.

It's a 4-year-old interview with Bill O'Baxter, whose breath was smelling like Barack Obama's @ss 4 years ago.

Thrid attempt to dismiss Palin's stated immigration policy, in this instance discrediting Bill O'Reilly whose statement is not in question.  It's Palin's that is.

He hasnb't even listened to the provided section of the interview.  Still obviously under the impressing not listening to the intereview is not avoidence, and thus leaving disinformation as the only response to reason..

BTW - have you retracted your DUmpster line from the beginning of this thread - "a failed half term governor"?

I thought not.

Fourth attempt to dismiss Palin's stated immigration policy, in this instance trying to change the subject again...

Here are some posts where I addressed this subject openly and honestly.  LINK LINK LINK

Here's the core issue once again.  Do we want 20-35 million Illegal Aliens Registered, made legal in that moment, and to Remain in Place to work here?

Do we want them, their children, and the chain immigration to follow, to result in between 80 to 200 million new citizens in under 20 years from North, Central, and South America?  Yes or no?

Do we want the Democrat party to get their votes, as they do the votes of recent new citizens from this region.

One of us is paying attention to what is being said by the candidates.  The other at 371 posts into this thread, admits he is too fragile to listen to the interview linked below, and so it becomes crystal clear why he cannot address the issue coherently.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

[DoughtyOne]

One Palin Supporter: LINK  

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here:  LINK

Once again, nothing here addressing the issue at hand.  You just continue to remain withiout character in your rants to avoid reality.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

[kiryandil]

Gads, it’s fun watching you wiggle with your hand sticking in that coconut.

[DoughtyOne]

One Palin Supporter: LINK  

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here:  LINK

Actually, it's Free Republic "old school" for dealing with Palin-slandering windbags like you.

No, it's the last refuge for folks who never had any class, and didn't understand why they shouldn't denegrate all Freepers by claiming they share disgusting Leftist behaviors.

Let go of the rice, monkey.

Once again, the Palestinian's favorite retort to the Jewsish people.

Your interpretation of a 4-year-old Sarah Palin interview is NOT an "official Palin policy",

Palin states in her own words what her policy is.  Folks can listen to it and decide for themselves.

Is there a reason why you don't explain how you differ with her stated policy?  Do you agree with it?.

...and your wife is NOT Morgan Fairchild.

I have nothing against Morgan Fairchild, but my wife was someone I respected more than any other person, including myself.  As for her beauty, I have never seen anything more beautiful.  As for every other aspect of her, there was no competition for first place in my eyes.  As for what anyone else thought of her, it couldn't matter less, but not seeing the beauty in this woman would certainly call into question a person's credibility.  And trying to use her as leverage in a political debate, is something that would be beneath all but the most lacking in character and depraved of people.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

[kiryandil]

the Jewsish people

Are those the "gay Jews"? Not that there's anything wrong with that...

[DoughtyOne]

One Palin Supporter: LINK  

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here:  LINK

To what dephths will they stoop:  LINK  addressed here: LINK

I don't get a lot of pleasure out of watching you destroy yourself here.  It is what it is.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.