Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul on Education: "I Don't Think You'd Notice If The Whole Department Was Gone Tomorrow"
realclearpolitics.com ^ | April 23, 2014

Posted on 04/23/2014 11:28:17 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion

Excerpt of the face off between Rand Paul and David Axelrod at the University of Chicago:

RAND PAUL: Education historically was a state and local subject and I think that what we've seen is since we've spent about a hundred billion dollars in the Department of Education each year and that's been going on since 1980. I'm not so sure we're better off than we were before. You see, the one thing --

DAVID AXELROD: So you would vote for a budget that would eliminate most of that.

RAND PAUL: Well what I would do is I would have its spent on the state and local level. I wouldn't take it up there at all, I'd leave it at leave it at home. So you'd spend the money. You might still spend the money in your state government, but education even now, 90, 95-percent of your education dollars are state and local. That $100 billion gets rolled around in a big bureaucracy. They sent rules down that don't help education, they hinder innovation. I would cut them out of the loop. I don't think you'd notice if the whole department was gone tomorrow.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arth; educationdept; libtardian; randpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: BarnacleCenturion

So, Rand Paul leaves Illegal Aliens in line to become Citizens and Cruz states they should never become citizens, ever.

So just how is Cruz to the left of Rand on this issue?


81 posted on 04/23/2014 6:49:44 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

The bottom line is that they are not that different...

Ted Cruz Speech Nods to Increasing Libertarian Views within Republican Party

http://www.cato.org/blog/ted-cruz-speech-nods-increasing-libertarian-views-within-republican-party

GOP Congressman: Cruz Is A Libertarian, Not A Mainstream Republican

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/09/25/gop_congressman_cruz_is_a_libertarian_not_a_mainstream_republican.html

Ted Cruz: Libertarians Should Be ‘Dismayed’ By Obama’s Selective Enforcement Of Drug Law

http://personalliberty.com/ted-cruz-libertarians-should-be-dismayed-by-obamas-selective-enforcement-of-drug-law/

Ronald Reagan’s opinion on Libertarianism

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg0Axyvlkm0


82 posted on 04/23/2014 6:57:04 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion; ansel12
As I told you before, Cruz stands to the left of Rand on EVERY issue:

So it comes out today that Rand Paul states this about Abortion, even though more than half of the country is already against Abortion:

Rand Paul on abortion: “We’re not changing any of the laws until the country is persuaded otherwise”

And yet Ted Cruz is out there STILL fighting the good fight against Abortion as this article proves:

Ted Cruz’s Support For Texas Pro-life Bill: “Without Life, There Is No Liberty”

You're a Liar!
83 posted on 04/23/2014 6:58:16 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion; ansel12
As I told you before, Cruz stands to the left of Rand on EVERY issue:

So Rand Paul comes out and states that we need to de-emphasize the social issues as proven by the following article and goes so far as to state:

Paul said he agreed with Kennedy, whom he called “someone who doesn’t just want to be in front of opinion but wants government to keep up with opinion.” He said Kennedy “tried to strike a balance.”


Rand Paul: On Gay Marriage GOP Needs to ‘Agree to Disagree’

And yet we have Ted Cruz doing the exact opposite, trying to fight legally to protect those states that have made Gay Marriage illegal by enshrining protection in the law for those states. At the time of the writing of this article, the vocal "States-Rights" guy, Rand Paul, especially on Gay Marriage, had failed to become a co-sponsor.

Ted Cruz Introduces Anti-Gay Marriage Bill

Once again, YOU ARE A LIAR!
84 posted on 04/23/2014 7:06:19 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

You are destroying any shred of credibility you might have with this increasingly silly and propagandist posting.

Now you are trying to bizarrely portray Cruz and Reagan as “libertarians”

You are losing it, and that is not intended to be a flippant insult, or any kind of insult, it just means you are getting goofier and goofier in pushing Rand Paul.


85 posted on 04/23/2014 7:07:32 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You can’t blaspheme the truth away, pal.


86 posted on 04/23/2014 7:09:22 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Rand Paul Introduces ‘Life at Conception Act’

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/15/rand-paul-introduces-life-at-conception-act/


87 posted on 04/23/2014 7:36:37 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

Thanks for the ping!


88 posted on 04/23/2014 7:43:13 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) appears to be a double-minded man on abortion. How he can last week be the primary sponsor for a Life at Conception bill and then the following week tell CNN in an interview that there are “thousands of exceptions” is beyond me. The Hill reports:

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Tuesday he’s open to “thousands of exceptions” to a ban on abortion.

Paul has said he believes life begins at conception, but in an interview with CNN the Republican emphasized he is also a physician who treats each case individually.

“What I would say is that there are thousands of exceptions,” Paul told CNN host Wolf Blitzer in response to a question about exceptions to a ban.

“You know, I’m a physician and every individual case is going to be different and everything’s going to be particular to that individual case and what’s going on with that mother and the medical circumstances of that mother,” he said.

The comments come just a week after Paul, a possible White House contender in 2016, introduced the “Life at Conception Act.”


89 posted on 04/23/2014 8:23:04 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion; SoConPubbie
As I told you before, Cruz stands to the left of Rand on EVERY issue:

There is no chance that you could be ignorant enough than to make this statement without a plan. Paul is to the right of Cruz? Do I have your statement correct? If so, you are not being sincere, to say the least.

90 posted on 04/23/2014 8:29:16 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
As I told you before, Cruz stands to the left of Rand on EVERY issue

You must be looking at the world thru a mirror...

91 posted on 04/23/2014 8:47:10 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Only smart thing Paul is reported as saying this week.


92 posted on 04/24/2014 5:20:26 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Well, the rest is propaganda spread by the haters. Everyone should watch the entire interview and judge by themselves.


93 posted on 04/24/2014 6:07:31 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“George W, had very powerful effects on pro-life efforts,” Globalist George W gave us 8 years of Obama. Not good for the pro-life cause. His first choice for SC was some woman with no record. He only withdrew her nomination after conservatives balked.


94 posted on 04/24/2014 8:17:38 AM PDT by Augustinian monk (RAND PAUL FOR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Augustinian monk

Your post 67 was more than answered in post 69, you are playing games.

Passionate pro-life presidents like Reagan and George W, had very powerful effects on pro-life efforts, and pro-life politics save lives.

When a politician becomes a campaigner against the pro-life movement, and starts undermining it, he is causing deaths, and weakening the movement, and undermining the party platform, which is a deliberate action that Rand Paul has taken as he has already started campaigning against the social conservative platform.

“”On January 22, thousands gathered on the National Mall in Washington for the annual March for Life that takes place on the date that Roe v. Wade was decided by the Supreme Court.

The same week, the Republican National Committee decided that it was time for the national party to wade back into the pro-life waters after a perceived hiatus from using it as a platform issue. A “Resolution on Republican Pro-Life Strategy” formally re-established abortion as a 2014 election issue for the party and seeks to push back on the “war on women” rhetoric that Democrats have made synonymous with the pro-life movement.

The RNC clearly believes once again that a prominent pro-life position plays well with voters. Perhaps the national party has taken note of what’s happening at the state level. Twenty-four states enacted 53 anti-abortion measures in 2013 alone.

Research from the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute shows that in the last three years, states have enacted an unprecedented 205 different abortion restrictions. This was made possible by the fact that over half of the states in the union have pro-life governors and pro-life majorities in their legislatures.””


95 posted on 04/24/2014 11:53:48 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion; 2Jedismom; 6amgelsmama; AAABEST; aberaussie; AccountantMom; Aggie Mama; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)

The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.

96 posted on 04/24/2014 6:02:33 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson