Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zeneta; GilesB

Nevada is in exactly the same boat as New Mexico, Arizona, and California.

All private rights and interests that were in existence at the time that the treaty was signed are to be preserved.

There was no power to change any of these holdings permitted under the treaty.
.


140 posted on 04/19/2014 2:51:59 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

Thanks for that. There are no doubt differences between grazing laws that established the rights in the first place, but once established, the treaty protected them. Right?


149 posted on 04/19/2014 3:00:25 PM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

Nevada is in exactly the same boat as New Mexico, Arizona, and California.

All private rights and interests that were in existence at the time that the treaty was signed are to be preserved.

There was no power to change any of these holdings permitted under the treaty.


This then comes down to the fundamental issue of “Sovereignty”.

That of the individual vs that of sovereignty being forced upon the individual by government.


156 posted on 04/19/2014 3:09:25 PM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson