Posted on 04/13/2014 2:51:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
But Sarah BO was a constitutional scholar at the University of Chicago. Really a constitutional scholar and the Easter Bunny will arrive on Easter Sunday giving all good boys and girls peeps and chocolate eggs.
Good point, newbie...
Except for the fact that 98% of incumbents get reelected because they have ginned the system to be in their favor and make it NEARLY impossible to get one of these rotting corpses OUT of government...
COS will propose and PASS a Constitutional amendment to go to the states with HARD term limits... So jackasses like McCain, Graham, Cochran, Alexander, et al WON’T be on the ballot in 12 years...
The best thing we can do TODAY is to elect as many LOCAL CONSERVATIVES as possible to EVERY SEAT we can find. The Progressives have been at this 100 years... It aint gonna get fixed in a few election cycles...
Support the COS...
http://conventionofstates.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDUWpLnS63M
2001 Obama interview on Chicago public radio on his beliefs about the Constitution - with commentary by Mark Levin
That Congress?
I saw her first.
“....either not understanding or deliberately disrespecting the Constitution.”
.
Hey Sarah, what do YOU think it is?
Complete your assessment please and give us your honest opinion or else you will look like any other “moderate” politician.
The democrats in the senate protect all of their marxist buddies from impeachment and removal from office. There will be no impeachment until there are enough conservative senators to convict with narry a libtard vote.
Timeless statement. Did he see the future?
Some things never change!
Oh, really? She’s famous, powerful, wealthy, effective, world-renowned, has IOUs from many powerful people and has a happy life.
Sarah Palin and Boss Jim in 2016!? What a ticket!
One goofy ass lookin’ Camel Toe yer packin’ there Hillary......
Well well well, listen to the noobie squarin’ us away on Sarah!! “Until other FReepers get it”....WOW! You are so smart! Thanks for all you do here!
I was actually under a different name years ago...
___
Really? Tell us, jarhead...what name were you under years ago? Did you try and set FReepers and patriots like Sarah Palin straight back then, too? Just curious.
When is she going to run? Is she waiting for a suitable running mate? Who would it be?
What im trying to express before Jane decided to bestow upon me the ever so expected lib title (never mind this former Jarhead is about as conservative as they come) is that Sarah, some Freepers and conservatives alike have continued to fail because the target is wrong. The populous (no matter how misguided) doesnt latch on to Sarah bashing the One. If conservatives expect the One to be held to account then keep doing what is being done and ill ask “how’s that working out for ya?” Obambi can only get away with that which Congress allows.
I am no longer angry at him; it is a waste of energy. Take it up with Congress. They have allowed him to rule the way he has. Instead Sarah choose (as she has continued to do) to take the easy target. She and all of us need to place pressure where it belongs with Congress. But we can keep bashing, keep doing the same ol losing strategy of invoking his name. But I will again ask “hows that working out for ya?”
Oh he understands it perfectly. And he hates it with a passion!
You can continue to try to bait me into god knows what you are attempting to provoke but please dont waste your time. Back then approx 8-9 years ago (long before Sarah’s name was ever muttered) it was AbsoluteJustice. I stopped posting quite a long time ago. I dont know what your angle is but I find anyone disagreeing with Sarah’s tactics invokes a dervish frenzy. This is not my intent. Read earlier, her strategy to continue bashing Obama is not working. I hate to alert you to this but he doesnt care. However power hungry Congress critters do. They refuse to hold Obama accountable and she would be better served to use her energy pointing this out. We can either continue bashing the man for god knows what reason likes (it wont get us anywhere) or hold accountable those we vote responsible for holding him accountable. That seems to be a much better strategy.
Was he ever supposed to care?
I think this was supposed to be about getting potential voters to care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.