THE BUNDY DAUGHTER SPEAKS OUT ON GOVERNMENT TERRORISM AGAINST HER FAMILY! (Nevada Rancher)

America's Freedom Fighters ^ | Apr 9, 2014 | Clark Kent

[xzins]

By SHIREE BUNDY COX:

I have had people ask me to explain my dad’s stance on this BLM fight.

Here it is in as simple of terms as I can explain it. There is so much to it, but here it is in a nut shell.

My great grandpa bought the rights to the Bunkerville allotment back in 1887 around there. Then he sold them to my grandpa who then turned them over to my dad in 1972.

These men bought and paid for their rights to the range and also built waters, fences and roads to assure the survival of their cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars.

These rights to the land use is called preemptive rights.

Some where down the line, to keep the cows from over grazing, came the bureau of land management. They were supposed to assist the ranchers in the management of their ranges while the ranchers paid a yearly allotment which was to be use to pay the BLM wages and to help with repairs and improvements of the ranches.

My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve.

Instead they began using these money’s against the ranchers.

They bought all the rest of the ranchers in the area out with their own grazing fees.

When they offered to buy my dad out for a penence he said no thanks and then fired them because they weren’t doing their job.

He quit paying the BLM but, tried giving his grazing fees to the county, which they turned down.

So my dad just went on running his ranch and making his own improvements with his own equipment and his own money, not taxes.

In essence the BLM was managing my dad out of business.

Well when buying him out didn’t work, they used the indangered species card.

You’ve already heard about the desert tortis.

Well that didn’t work either, so then began the threats and the court orders, which my dad has proven to be unlawful for all these years.

Now they’re desperate.

It’s come down to buying the brand inspector off and threatening the County Sheriff.

Everything they’re doing at this point is illegal and totally against the constitution of the United States of America.

Now you may be saying,” how sad, but what does this have to do with me?” Well, I’ll tell you.

They will get rid of Cliven Bundy, the last man standing on the Bunkerville allotment and then they will close all the roads so no one can ever go on it again.

Next, it’s Utah’s turn. Mark my words, Utah is next.

Then there’s the issue of the cattle that are at this moment being stolen. See even if dad hasn’t paid them, those cattle do belong to him.

Regardless where they are they are my fathers property. His herd has been part of that range for over a hundred years, long before the BLM even existed.

Now the Feds think they can just come in and remove them and sell them without a legal brand inspection or without my dad’s signature on it.

They think they can take them over two boarders, which is illegal, ask any trucker. Then they plan to take them to the Richfeild Auction and sell them.

All with our tax money.

They have paid off the contract cowboys and the auction owner as well as the Nevada brand inspector with our tax dollars.

See how slick they are?

Well, this is it in a nut shell. Thanks”

[SgtHooper]

Wholeheartedly agree! A major problem is, being who we are usually means that we have a lot of material/financial things to lose, in contrast with the “other side” who generally has everything to gain. That “other side” is getting stuff for free right now. We need to prepare/protect as much as we have right now in order to survive as best we can once we “cross the line”. Once crossed, all sorts of bad things can happen. It really only should occur as a collective—a large number (e.g., 1000’s, 10,000’s, etc.) of us who band together and live as a defensible unit post line crossing. Individually or even small numbers, it cannot work. The “collective” is not yet organized to handle physical confrontation.

[mom.mom]

Why would you pay a grazing fee if the government was taking that right away from you?

[ctdonath2]

We do that by charging usage fees which are applied to facilitate maintenance and organization of appropriate use. That’s what The Bundys agreed to.

Problem is, BLM increased fees substantially, and did NOT route those fees back to caretaking. As other ranchers learned, the new fees are designed to discourage ALL use, and to drive ranchers off the land entirely.

Maintenance & facilitation fees are fair, and a proper role of government.
Abusing the fee process for private gain (a la Reid’s solar farm involvement) is intolerable, and Bundy is laudable for standing up to such bureaucratic abuse.

[yoe]

This is NOT what our founding fathers intended. Shame on these agents...shame on every last one of’em.

Shame on those who were willing to be bought off along the way......

[GAFreedom]

GAFreedom is a misnomer. I thought it meant Georgia Freedom, but perhaps it’s Government Accountability Freedom...iow, no freedom at all. In any case, I don’t think he/she realizes that freedom is not based on the judiciary’s decisions on Free Republic.

There are two types of freedom. One is the type of the freedom we enjoy here in the United States, under the aegis of the Constitution and the laws that safeguard our liberty. The other type of freedom is that without laws, where nothing governs no one and anarchy reigns. I'm for the former. I'm against the latter.

After all, the judges say that killing babies is OK.

And that is bad law and we must work to have it overturned. And as God is on our side, that victory is inevitable. But let's not be deceived that it will not take hard work.

It also doesn't mean that we throw out the whole barrel because of a few bad apples. That's not freedom either.

[P-Marlowe]

Problem is, BLM increased fees substantially, and did NOT route those fees back to caretaking. As other ranchers learned, the new fees are designed to discourage ALL use, and to drive ranchers off the land entirely.

Which amounts to a regulatory taking without just compensation. If they don't want ranchers, then they should just buy the ranches. Instead they use regulatory powers to drive them out of business, in this case a family business that has been running for over 100 years.

[Jim Robinson]

The federal government controlling 80 some odd percent of Nevada’s land is bad law.

Federal judges do the dirty work for their federal bosses.

Yup, the entire rotten barrel of unconstitutional “federal law” needs to be thrown out.

You do realize that the federal government aimed over 100 military grade weapons on hundreds of innocent Americans Saturday and had so much as a passing car backfired during those tense moments or some hot head on either side or even a saboteur got an itchy finger, hundreds of people could have been slaughtered?

And this over tortoises? Or even unpaid grazing fees?

Why do you defend this heavy handed fascism?

[P-Marlowe]

It also doesn't mean that we throw out the whole barrel because of a few bad apples.

The whole barrel is filled with rotten apples.

Obviously to a statist like yourself, rotten apples are just peachy.

Zot!