Posted on 04/09/2014 6:57:10 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
FUEH
I know where he can put “his bracelet”. Yep, right on up there where the sun don’t shine.
common sense reforms last year, Vice President Biden and I had a meeting.................................. Right there they lost me!
I’d like to see this holder commie minion handcuffs.
Criminals wear bracelets. I suppose all guns that can’t be retrofitted will need to be confiscated. FUEH!
first he dresses like crime fighting Mayor Dewey from the early century crime mafya, espousing his. hitler mustache, and now he thinks the guns should vote for him like as if he was the Mermaid King of the crabs.
This guy is one of those guys, like a black Hitler. i bet he drives a German Nazi mobile. ahe thinks he is the chief of troops.
Why the freaking stache?
This is their trial balloon. In the end they won’t settle for bracelets to operate weapons. This is the first step toward the required “star of David” to be worn by all non-democrat, non-fascists so that they can be identified for beatings and elimination.
Will they want monitoring bracelets for first amendment activities too ?
Instead of calling him a gun runner, which is true, perhaps he should be called a “gun criminal”, or more technically true, an “unindicted gun criminal”. “Unindicted gun trafficker?”
Will the youth gangs who lay waste to our cities be required to wear these bracelets, since they all have guns???
This worthless piece of crap should be rotting in federal prison until the end of World War VII.
An interesting evil twist on the mark of the beast.
The implanted microchip is their end goal.
I am always on the lookout for an OTB gun.
I’m sure that microchips will be the 21st century version of the Star of David.
It sounds a lot like wearing the Star of David on the sleeve.
It’s not a bad idea actually, from the perspective of the owner of the gun being able to pick it up and have it automatically unlock and be ready for use, as opposed to the time necessary to take a fingerprint scan, punch in a pin code, etc.
But that’s ONLY from a voluntary use perspective. Downsides include the ability of the police (or someone who had hacked police capability) to keep the gun locked down, remotely, the ability to electonically track and trace guns in realtime, etc.
I *might* be willing to have one of these as a primary home defense weapon, under certain circumstances. With another weapon that didn’t have such a locking mechanism close by (and more concealed at the expense of instant access) in case the primary didn’t work when I needed it to.
Let's see, Holder works for the antiCHRIST, so this must be THE MARK OF THE BEAST!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.