1 posted on
04/08/2014 12:26:39 PM PDT by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
fascism. as a veneer for socialism. transitory step inot fullblown socialism.
2 posted on
04/08/2014 12:28:51 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: lowbridge
Sounds like a bunch of Crapo to me.
3 posted on
04/08/2014 12:29:49 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("A man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; a man who respects it has earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: lowbridge
Translation: CASH SALES FOR HOMES ONLY!
5 posted on
04/08/2014 12:37:59 PM PDT by
Safrguns
(PM me if you like to play Minecraft!)
To: lowbridge
Ultimate goal is complete takeover of everything.
6 posted on
04/08/2014 12:40:15 PM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
To: lowbridge
Why not add a little socialism to our fascism.
To: lowbridge
If you like your house and mortgage, you can keep them, ....just as long as you keep electing DemoRats.
8 posted on
04/08/2014 12:48:03 PM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
To: lowbridge
Doesn’t gubmint already own 90+% of existin home loans now?
9 posted on
04/08/2014 12:50:12 PM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
To: lowbridge
All you houses are belong to us!.......................
10 posted on
04/08/2014 12:57:19 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
To: lowbridge; All
Please note that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had decided against granting banking powers to Congress.
A proposition was made to them to authorize Congress to open canals, and an amendatory one to empower them to incorporate. But the whole was rejected, and one of the reasons for rejection urged in debate was, that then they would have a power to erect a bank (emphasis added), which would render the great cities, where there were prejudices and jealousies on the subject, adverse to the reception of the Constitution . Jeffersons Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791.
And regardless that FDR's activist justices gave the green light to a Democratic-controlled Congress to overstep its Commerce Clause powers in the 1940s, a previous generation of Constitution-respecting justices had officially clarified that the states have never delegated to Congress, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate commerce, the intrastate housing market the example of this thread.
State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress. (emphases added) Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
To: lowbridge
Crapo - an appropriate name for this bill ...
12 posted on
04/08/2014 1:56:26 PM PDT by
Lmo56
(If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
To: lowbridge
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do have past and present issues, but this replacement by a federal mortgage agency is even more Crapo.
13 posted on
04/08/2014 3:14:28 PM PDT by
RicocheT
(Where neither their property nor their honor is touched, most men live content, Niccolo Machiavelli)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson