Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

They should carry insurance, I do, but thats kind of beside the point. At what point do we refuse to rescue people or charge them? If there are assets in the area the crews certainly benefit from the real world experience.


81 posted on 04/06/2014 5:14:30 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

I mean they should have insurance to reimburse a CG/military rescue. I don’t think we refuse to rescue, unless it puts the potential rescuers at too much risk. And we charge when it’s an above-and-beyond, rather than within the scope of regular patrols, etc.. There is some line to be drawn there, but it makes sense to draw one.


83 posted on 04/06/2014 5:22:10 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson