Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Hillary Clinton winning Catholics, Protestants, and 36% of evangelicals
The Washington Examiner ^ | April 3, 2014 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 04/03/2014 3:59:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: LMAO

Remember, every time conservstism runs, it wins.

Except for all those times it lost.


61 posted on 04/03/2014 5:20:03 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
Apparently most Christians are not Christians. Vomit-inducing.

Well, my guess is, they don't know the Lord, or they don't know the issues. I have heard others say we will not see another Republican president for many moons. They may be right. I hope I am wrong, but I think Hidebeast beats anybody in a landslide. We just do not have the same country anymore. The Obungler showed us that.

62 posted on 04/03/2014 5:32:41 PM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Should it play out that this is accurate, America deserves every single bite of the massive crap sandwich coming.

I don’t think it’s anywhere near a done deal with the HildaBeast. OTOH, the GOPe is already hard at work to lose 2016. And they have a pretty good track record for losing sure things.


63 posted on 04/03/2014 5:33:58 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
She leads the Republicans among virtually all groups of voters, including younger Americans, men, white voters and independents. She’s even supported by 36 percent of evangelical voters.

Looks like the same group of idiots that couldn't wait to elect the first black (incompetent as hell..) President now can't wait to elect the first woman President.

This country has just gone to shit.

64 posted on 04/03/2014 5:35:24 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Then start hitting the ammunition shop. Time’s ticking for the dying empire. In the end, when the money is worth nothing and the riots start, the men with the guns are going to set the agenda, and its not going to pretty for the leftists. Just like Romania and Chile.


65 posted on 04/03/2014 5:37:04 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: stormhill
That's true, you can't beat something with nothing. But Clinton has not shown herself to be a formidable candidate. While she won the Senate seat against a nonentity, and fresh out of the White House after 8 years, she was easily outflanked by the upstart Obama in 2008. She did not look presidential and almost a parody of herself at times ("Ah'm not no ways Tarred...".) Her tenure as SoS was mediocre to say the least.

A strong vigorous challenge will beat her. But another Dole/Bush/McCain will not.

66 posted on 04/03/2014 5:48:00 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; stormhill

Not trying to discredit Palin at all, or any one of the folks I mentioned.

I simply posit the idea that they never gained any traction because they were more conservative than the RINO wing preferred. And thus relegated to second tier or third tier status by the media and their RINO accomplices.

How a guy like Jon Huntsman makes it to first tier status is beyond me...yet, there he was on the debate stage stunningly late and finishing 3rd in New Hampshire.

Yet any one of the folks I mentioned (except Huntsman) would have been FAR superior to Obastard.

And for the record...how did you get Reagan in there? You must not read very well.


67 posted on 04/03/2014 5:55:43 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

she’s heavily into plastic surgery, as some recent photos seem to indicate.
The eyes will be ping pong balls by 2016


68 posted on 04/03/2014 5:58:28 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The problem is the rats are gonna vote for her regardless. Because she has a vagina a lot of republican women will vote for her too. I maintain the rats will take the House and hold the Senate and regardless of which rat runs for president they will win that too. Obama succeeded in creating a majority dependent underclass and will reinforce it with blanket amnesty.


69 posted on 04/03/2014 6:00:26 PM PDT by TheArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Reagan was a “firey conservative”, Ronnie Raygun was known as a right winger, an ultra conservative, and he became president, on his third try.

Your list is ridiculous, “”see Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, Herman Cain, Allan West,

Also Ted Cruz, Michell Bachmann, Sarah Palin, etc.””

Ted Cruz has never run, Palin hasn’t run, Bachmann was not a big timer, and couldn’t lead anything, not even in congress, Duncan Hunter was retiring after 28 years and was only out to get publicity for his son to take over his lifetime seat, Tancredo was like a Bachmann, playing above his skill level, Cain has never held office, and Allen West never ran for president and is a 1 term Congressman.

Did you really think that a Duncan Hunter or Hermann Cain, or Tancredo, or Bachmann, were big enough personalities to become president? Even they didn’t think that.


70 posted on 04/03/2014 6:10:38 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
With a crushing dominance shown in repeated polls, Democrat Hillary Clinton is on a path to do something her husband and two-term president never achieved: win a majority of more than 50 percent of the presidential vote in 2016.

Ah, yes. I too remember 2008.

71 posted on 04/03/2014 6:16:20 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2016: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Not a joke there. About 50% of Evangelicals are in the South; 87% are over 30; 81% are White/non-Hispanic.

Subtract out these demos and I think what remains - non-South, non-White, young.. - that’s where you’ll find Hillary’s voters.


72 posted on 04/03/2014 6:17:55 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

All you have to do is have dead American blood on your hands and your a shoe in for Presidency


73 posted on 04/03/2014 6:21:08 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Hillary won’t get 36% of the Evangelical vote, not even close to it, and she won’t get the Protestant vote, this is just what post 2 said it was, something related to name recognition.

Polls at this stage, don’t have any real meaning.


74 posted on 04/03/2014 6:24:07 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The 36% of Evangelicals comes from the fact that most blacks call themselves evangelicals.....so don’t get too depressed. Also, Evangelicals are Protestants, so one has to wonder about this poll’s methodology.


75 posted on 04/03/2014 6:25:39 PM PDT by cookcounty (IRS = Internal Revenge Service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Right, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2008, the Clintons have not exactly proven themselves as great vote winners, even to accept her gift of a senate seat, Hillary had to move to New York.


76 posted on 04/03/2014 6:31:03 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

On what possible basis?


77 posted on 04/03/2014 6:32:53 PM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Hail to the Chief!

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho!


78 posted on 04/03/2014 6:39:16 PM PDT by RebelBanker (May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
Then start hitting the ammunition shop. Time’s ticking for the dying empire. In the end, when the money is worth nothing and the riots start, the men with the guns are going to set the agenda, and its not going to pretty for the leftists. Just like Romania and Chile.

Yes, it won't be pretty, like LA riots everywhere. The cops and Feds won't be able to stop the carnage, when the welfare queens don't get their checks. Keep your powder dry.

79 posted on 04/03/2014 6:45:33 PM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This Catholic won’t vote for her.


80 posted on 04/03/2014 6:47:27 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson