All your arguments are predicated on the idea that allowing homosexuals to serve openly is harming the country. While I agree there will be a general decay of the culture which the civilian world is already leaps and bounds ahead of us on, there’s no evidence to say that it’s truly harming anyone or anything. Homosexuals have been serving more or less openly for many years now. I knew of a half-dozen or more within a 100m radius of my desk in Afghanistan nearly five years ago.
And I still haven’t heard how the brass resigning was supposed to help the situation.
Are you freaking serious? Really? Lets skip the fact you ignored my questions. NO evidence? You serieZ?
Two words “Chelsea” Manning. By itself ‘it’ is proof positive homosexuality has directly negatively impacted the military and America.
Puke. You are a relativist. Embrace the fail in everything, as there will be no end to it.
Homos are nothing but trouble.
If there was such evidence, do you think it would be made public? And was anyone or anything really being harmed by the previous policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" or the one before that of a complete ban on gays in the military? Shouldn't the real measure be the operational effectiveness of the military and not some social agenda?
As someone who has also served, I can see real problems occurring between those who are straight and those who are openly gay. It is a divisive issue, especially in the kinds of circumstances that the military presents in terms of a close, working environment. The same obtains in the introduction of women into ground combat units. Even our elite political masters and social engineers cannot dictate human biologic behavior.
The admirals and generals were told to “accept” HIS push for gays in the military. In other words, don’t disagree or you’re ruined.
after reading your post, you need to pray for wisdom. Maybe when you get older, and if you keep your eyes open without “agenda vision”, you’ll realize how dangerous your thoughts are on gays and the military.