Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Rand Paul is Wrong to Blame the US for Pearl Harbor
FrontPage Mag ^ | 04/01/2014 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 04/01/2014 8:08:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: Bon of Babble
Nice quote, but dumb as Biden is, he didn't say that.

He said FDR went on television when the stock market crashed. Rep. Keith Ellison said that the Nazis bombed Pearl Harbor (as did John Belushi's character in Animal House.

Somehow all this got mixed up on the Internet. Some of the Dan Quayle quotes that circulated are likewise not true.

81 posted on 05/03/2014 12:03:05 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

I’m curious — why do you continue to make stupid and false claims about what the Constitution says?


82 posted on 05/03/2014 12:15:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Pauls would say that Japan wanted Indonesia (the Dutch East Indies) because they wanted the oil after the US cut off trade and that the attacks on other European colonial powers and the US resulted from that.

I don't know if that's true -- who can say at this point -- but simply assuming that Japan was determined to attack all colonial possessions in Asia looks like bad history.

Dictatorships and other governments may have vague dreams of conquest and world domination, but what they actually do has a lot to do with changing circumstances -- the pressures and opportunities that arise in their environment, sometimes as a result of what other nations do.

We can't exclude the possibility that Japan would have lashed out at British, French, and Dutch possessions after Hitler conquered Western Europe -- maybe Japan would have found it hard to resist the temptation -- but we also can't assume that the Japanese (who had their hands full in China) would take on such a massive task if their flow of oil was secure.

83 posted on 05/03/2014 12:31:47 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Never mind I was just mildly interested in why you are so opposed to a small government, constitutional conservative. But go right away and keep bashing one of the most conservative senators in the US Senate.


84 posted on 05/03/2014 3:52:01 PM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Prior to WWII Japan had an extraordinary economic growth. It was overpopulated and starving for more resources to sustain improving living conditions for it’s people. They has two vectors to expand: Asia and Pacific. Asia was more favorable in the 1930s but as Japanese were on the roll Soviets interdicted them carving Mongolia from China, installed a puppet regime and drew a red line to keep them out of Russia there. Japanese tried to resolve it militarily but had their butts handed to them a couple times.
After that a Pacific vector, dominated by the US, became more favorable for the Japanese who thought America is all butter and no guns comparing to rival ‘white barbarians’ in Siberia.
The rest is history.


85 posted on 05/04/2014 3:32:58 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson