Posted on 03/30/2014 12:36:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t think Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
Yes, his father was born in Kenya, and his brother was born in Kenya. But that doesn’t mean he himself was born in Kenya.
And yes, for 16 years he allowed his literary agent to circulate a one-paragraph bio stating that he was born in Kenya, which was revised numerous times over the years while continuing to state that he was born in Kenya. But I’m inclined to think he did that because it seemed cool and a way to sell books and not because it was true.
And yes, he refuses to release his college transcripts, as other presidents and candidates have done. But I’m guessing that’s because they show poor grades and not because they state he was a foreign student.
And yes, for many years he attended a church where the pastor sometimes exclaimed, “God damn America!” but I think he was just trying to fit in.
No, I don’t think he’s Kenyan.
But I wonder whether he’s Manchurian.
“The Manchurian Candidate” was a 2004 movie about a U.S. politician who was secretly a “sleeper agent” working to overthrow American democracy. (Manchuria is the region of Russia and China where the agent had been brainwashed into working for the other side.)
Here’s why I wonder:
When Obama came into office, he announced that he was “resetting” America’s relationship with Russia. Sure enough, he then canceled the planned defensive missiles in Poland aimed at deterring a Russian invasion. That infuriated our Polish allies and pleased the Russians. He got nothing from the Russians in return that we know of.
Vladimir Putin was then the Russian prime minister, and Dmitri Medvedev was the Russian president. Putin was the boss, and Medvedev was his handpicked puppet.
Later, Obama spoke at a seminar with Medvedev, who speaks English. Putin was not there.
During a break, Obama approached Medvedev on the stage. Thinking his microphone was off, he said privately, just one on one, “This is my last election. After my election, I’ll have more flexibility.” The context was a discussion on defense. Good puppet that he was, Medvedev promised, “I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”
But the microphone was not off. The exchange was captured and recorded. And the pair also were captured by a distant video camera showing Obama warmly shaking the hand of Medvedev and patting Medvedev’s knee as they completed the exchange.
Ask yourself this: Why did Obama choose an awkward in-person exchange on a stage at a seminar for delivery of this important message? Why didn’t he simply pick up the phone in the Oval Office and call Putin directly? Could it be because he didn’t want any Americans to hear it — even White House aides and interpreters?
Fast forward another two years. Russia has invaded a sovereign nation, Ukraine, and has purported to annex part of it. Obama’s response so far has been to impose “sanctions” that are so trivial that the Russians have literally laughed at them.
Putin refuses to state whether he will extend his invasion farther into Ukraine or re-invade the East European countries that were liberated by the fall of the Soviet empire in 1991 — an event that Putin has repeatedly declared was “the major geopolitical disaster of the century.”
In contrast to Putin’s poker face, Obama — without being told Putin’s next move insofar as we know — has ruled out military options. In short, Putin has refused to rule out annexing additional sovereign nations, and Obama has refused to guarantee that he’ll stop him.
In dealing with foreign dictators gassing their people as they did in Syria, threatening to “wipe Israel off the map” with a nuclear attack as Iran repeatedly has done, invading sovereign nations as Russia has now done or threatening to reduce America to “radioactive dust” as one of Putin’s apparatchiks recently did, Obama promises “resets” and “flexibility.”
On those promises, by golly, he’s delivered. He boasts that his strategy constitutes “leading from behind.” (I wonder if he imagines that Putin is “following from the front.”)
In dealing with Americans, on the other hand, he shows less flexibility, gives few “resets” and most decidedly leads from the front. The White House uses the National Security Agency to spy on Americans, uses the IRS to target Americans with whom it disagrees politically, refuses to rescue American diplomats begging for help as they’re slaughtered in Benghazi, calls the American political party that freed the slaves “hostage takers” and, most recently, uses the CIA to conduct surveillance on American senators (according to the longtime Democratic senator who heads the Senate Foreign Relations Committee).
One more thing: That seminar — the one where Obama made his fateful promise to the Russians that in his defense of freedom and liberty he would be flexible — was in South Korea, just a few hundred miles from Manchuria.
It makes so much sense, yet it doesn’t. Obviously, this information is in the public domain so, if it’s true, wouldn’t it make sense that some powerful honorable person would have proven it and done something with it by now?
You’ve got it right- nothing about obama makes sense to Americans.
I think I was the first or one of the first to alert Freepers that emerging candidate Barack Hussein Obama had even then all the characteristics and connections of a “Manchurian Candidate.” Waking up to this now is like announcing that the sun comes up every morning. Even now, there are those who won’t admit to themselves, let along others, that they were hookwinked by a charlatan who is ruining their country and knows exactly what and how he is doing it. Obama just gets more and more “flexible” in selling the U.S. and her allies down the river.
From the above link:
Tom Fife
I first wrote about Tom Fife (photo above) more than two years ago, in my post of May 24, 2010, “Obama, a Sleeper Agent for World Communism.”
Fife is an American businessman and physicist. During the 2008 presidential campaign, Fife, then a U.S. government contractor, wrote an essay claiming that in 1992 while he was visiting Moscow, a woman with undying allegiance to Soviet Communism (the Soviet Union had recently collapsed, on December 31, 1991) told him that a black man named Barack, born of a white American woman and an African male, was being groomed by communists to be, and would be elected, President of the United States.
Fife’s story just won’t go away. In an interview (below) with geopolitical analyst Jeff Nyquist, Fife amplified on his 2008 account. The woman specified that this black man Barack, whom the Soviets were grooming to be U.S. President, is himself “a Soviet,” that is, a communist. She also said Barack was from Hawaii, educated in “Ivy League” schools, had been to New York, and was presently in Chicago.
*******************************************************************
The press is liberal - if this story had surfaces about Sarah Palin New York Times reporters would have tracked sources down to the ends of the earth.
It's an example of the perfect con. We have so many built-in mechanisms, normalcy bias, for example, to keep us from seeing what is taking place right in front of our eyes, if we really don't want to see it and then have to do something about it.
There are always more than a few voices who from the start will speak to our reluctance to see and encourage it, even teach us to laugh at those who also see what doesn't make sense and are trying to point it out.
We'll then just "go with it" and side with our normalcy bias, taking the path of least resistance and joining with those who point and laugh at those who continue to point out the truth(s) that we don't want to see. From then on, we can't allow ourselves to, and won't, see what is right before our eyes.
Because ultimately, at some point, those truths will be pointing back at us, as useful idiots, and our failure and guilt.
Few things are harder than admitting our failure and guilt for having fallen for, and then participating in, the con.
“We can state with conviction, therefore, that a man’s support for absolute government is in direct proportion to the contempt he feels for his country.”
Alexis de Tocqueville
Amazing how spot on his remarks are 179 years later!
What is known and not debatable, he is:
(_]o[_).
No need to insult honest bodily orifices that were designed with a purpose, lowly as it may be.
There are other words to describe him that are much much worse!
You’re kidding, right?
Right?
(Cowardice, blackmail, paid off, on board, thuggism, etc)
That is why no one has done or said anything. Other than a few heroes like Arpaio and Zullo, and they’re moving right along. They haven’t given up and neither should any other right minded American. Or anyone of any country, as the enemy combatant in the WH means harm for other countries as well. Look at his support for jihadis in the ME and so on.
The “powerful people in dee cee” know he is not eligible and what he is. They’re either on board with the treason or cowards. They don’t want to be Breitbarted. So they ignore the destruction of our country, or are actively participating. Stupid many of them are no doubt, but that is not the reason for the silence.
Rotters is such a good word.
Stanley Ann Dunham was a nanny. Well paid, no doubt.
However you wish to interpret it.
I was funnin.
Me too.
Lets see here...
Obama’ alleged mother anti-American.
Uncle Frank Davis a card carrying Communist.
The immediate Dunham family tied to Communists.
Bill Ayers his buddy a Communist and terrorist.
White House green Czar Van Jones a Communist
David Axelrod parents wrote for a Communist rag.
Bernardine Dohrn another terrorist and Marxist.
Stealth pResident Valerie Jarrett and daughter of Vernon Jarrett tied to Communism and writer of Communist rags.
Case Sunstein Regulation Czar and anti-capitalist.
Obama friends at Occidental were Communists.
Anita Dunn the White House Comm Director and who is married to Robert Bauer the former White House counsel and employed by that Communist firm Perkins Coie - Dunn’s “favorite political philosopher” is the Communist leader Mao T. Tung.
The Obama ‘Manchurian’ Communist/Marxist list is as long as the US debt.
The right time to act was in ‘08 before the usurper stole the election.
Cheney looked up, expecting an objection.
They ALL knew he was a fraud.
This was to certify the election.
2008
But no, most likely he's not any kind of sleeper. When he came along it was pretty late in the game for ideological allegiance to Moscow, and he and Putin really seem to hate each other.
Objections to the certification of the electoral vote have to be in writing. Cheney received no written objections signed by at least one Senator and at least one Representative, therefore he did not call for objections and the vote to certify Obama’s electors was unanimous.
3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress
“Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received.” http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/15
THanks.
Didn’t know that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.