Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Man found guilty of electronic cigarette law that does not exist
The Examiner ^ | 03-22-2014 | Jeff Sherwood

Posted on 03/24/2014 7:22:29 AM PDT by PaulCruz2016

Since the court failed to prove that Mr. Dewing was using a cell phone, they went after him for using the electronic cigarette. “The judge asked me if I know what the ‘e’ in e-cigarette means,” said Jason. “I told him it means electronic.” At this point the judge told Mr. Dewing that he was using a portable electronic device which is a violation of New York traffic law 1225-d. Jason, refusing to let the court off that easy, told him that an electronic cigarette was not classified as a portable electronic device under the law. He says, “They were baffled. In fact, they didn't even know the law. The District Attorney had to look it up after I recited it to them. It is ridiculous that I have never been to law school and do not make it a habit of studying the law, yet I had to tell them what their own law was!” Unfortunately for Jason, the law was not known by the court until after they had already found him guilty of violating New York traffic law 1225-d.

There is a bright side to this story for Jason Dewing. “The judge told me that if I would have made them aware of the law before he made his ruling he would have dismissed the ticket, but since he already made his ruling, the only way to overturn it was to go to appeals court.” Jason feels that he has a very good chance of the case being appealed since the law that he was found guilty of breaking does not even exist. “The way the law is written, an e-cigarette cannot make a call nor can it send text or data; therefore, it cannot be a portable electronic device,” said Jason.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: New York
KEYWORDS: ecigarette; ecigarrest; ecigs; nannystate; newyork; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Bloody Sam Roberts

I’ve found it to be a question of how much Justice can I afford? (Both time and money)


21 posted on 03/24/2014 8:34:53 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

What a dumb bunny judge. He should have to go to the appeals hearing and sit there like any non-official person - no electronic devices to amuse himself. On his own time, not the public dime.

My husband was ticketed for cellphone use in NYC - on his court date he successfully argued that he had only been turning off the GPS function as it was giving wrong directions, which was the truth - on that occasion.


22 posted on 03/24/2014 8:48:30 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

See my tagline.


23 posted on 03/24/2014 8:51:49 AM PDT by Valentine Michael Smith (You won't find justice in a Courtroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts; Paladin2

There’s a lot of truth to that - you either pay the fines and the insurance point, or you pay a lawyer to negotiate with the prosecutor, if we’re talking about traffic offenses.

Nonetheless, after paying a lawyer to handle some speeding tickets, my husband has handled them on his own, using the same language, and has generally been successful. Of course I think he should either stop speeding, get a radar detector, or acquire some sixth sense.


24 posted on 03/24/2014 8:53:49 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: heartwood
Of course I think he should either stop speeding, get a radar detector, or acquire some sixth sense.

After getting a good number of them as a young man and even learning how to beat them...I have adopted all three and have not had a speeding ticket in over 25 years.

25 posted on 03/24/2014 9:15:40 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Truth sounds like hate...to those who hate truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016
“The way the law is written, an e-cigarette cannot make a call nor can it send text or data; therefore, it cannot be a portable electronic device,” said Jason.

So I can drive while playing my classic GameBoy? Awesome!

26 posted on 03/24/2014 9:16:57 AM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Neither are some judges.


27 posted on 03/24/2014 9:17:50 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

My watch is electronic, so I guess by this judge’s reckoning, everybody who looks at their watch while driving is committing a crime.


28 posted on 03/24/2014 9:30:27 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

you are right,they should repeal every law passed since 1935.then pass one more law making it against the law to pass any more laws.


29 posted on 03/24/2014 9:49:49 AM PDT by old gringo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

How in the world did the DA or the judge ever pass the NYS Bar Exam? Both these two mental midgets should be disbarred and forbidden to practice law anywhere except Venezuela or Cuba.


30 posted on 03/24/2014 9:51:21 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

The other 50% are here in Illinois.


31 posted on 03/24/2014 9:54:53 AM PDT by thatjoeguy (Every law passed is one person forcing their morals on someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

> At least 50% of all idiots must be in some form of government in NY.
And the other 50% is made up of fools and morons.


32 posted on 03/24/2014 10:14:13 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Freedom isn't free; nor is it easy. END ALL TOTALITARIAN ACTIVITY NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

It seems as though the esteemed DA and virtuous jurist would require that motorists disable their hearing aids and pacemakers while driving.


33 posted on 03/24/2014 10:25:33 AM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Yes, I thought there was a way to appeal to the same court.


34 posted on 03/24/2014 10:27:22 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel

That would be distracted driving.

But the specific law ought to be respected for where it stops.


35 posted on 03/24/2014 10:28:27 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

This story on electronic smoking and the story on Justina Pelletier show you how far the system has gotten its head up its OWN A$$.


36 posted on 03/24/2014 10:43:28 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson