Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney: Veto Ariz. bill
The Hill ^ | February 25, 2014 | Mario Trujillo

Posted on 02/25/2014 4:56:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet; Pelham; Travis McGee; Ohioan

We are so screwed..

These modern day GOP weenies are starting to make Reconstruction era GOP look good in comparison

And coming from me....that’s saying something

I’m disgusted with these bastards and their egos

Who gives an eff what loser Romney thinks

He snatched defeat from the jaws of victory being a total testicless pussy to the holy black president

This is how we lost western civilization

To minorities...queers...ugly can’t get a man women....and an illegal invasion of third world landscapers and hotel maids

History will recall us as pitiful....not worthy of our damned fine mitochondrial advantage

My ancestry civilized this wretched world with their own blood

We gave it all away with nary a whimper

This is a difficult time to be alive as a middle aged man who recalls a better time with Zeiss clarity


81 posted on 02/25/2014 11:01:00 PM PST by wardaddy (Bus to Shreveport... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYF682WYRtw&feature=youtube_gdata_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservaKate

> Word’s don’t fail me. Just afraid if I post them...I would
> be banned from this site.

Heh. I stopped using those words a long time ago.

My current vocabulary does not contain invectives strong enough to characterize my disdain.


82 posted on 02/26/2014 1:10:12 AM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Not your state, a-hole.


83 posted on 02/26/2014 1:28:12 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

I do not think Paul Ryan was not the reason that they lost. He was barely a factor. To be honest I think they lost due to massive voter fraud.


84 posted on 02/26/2014 1:57:54 AM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Thanks for the info.


85 posted on 02/26/2014 4:23:30 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Finny; Patton@Bastogne
That "One in a Series -- Collect the full Set" really gets me every time.

Number Two in the Series exists and I posted it on FR. I simply can't find it. It's on one of several external drives.

86 posted on 02/26/2014 8:05:33 AM PST by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

87 posted on 02/26/2014 8:06:41 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Something is clearly afoot in the array of prominent persons who have jumped in on the idiotic side of the Arizona debate. As a lifelong opponent of legislation that forces once free Americans to ignore their own sentiments as they may regard the choices of with whom to do business, this hue and cry against the Arizona Legislature stands out as taking the demand for monolithic uniformity to a new low.

As you will remember, the attack was ratcheted up with Bill Clinton's attack on the armed forces, early in his tenure; ratcheted up again with the attack on Bob Jones University & the flying of the Confederate flag by South Carolina during the 2000 Primaries; ratcheted up again when Strom Thurmond retired, and Trent Lott allowed himself to be meekly thrown under the bus, a couple of years later.

But there is something really bizarre about this latest onslaught.

The two most likely explanations, in my opinion, is that those who want to make a mockery of marriage, are reacting with a vengeance in response to their not being able to intimidate Russia into backing down on legislation to protect Russian kids; or, and this is the scarier explanation, that the Left now is preparing for the final step in the Nazification of America, and has flexed its muscles to intimidate all those who can be intimidated, to join in the hue and cry.

At least the Courtiers in the Emperor's New Clothes did not feel the need to intimidate the little boy, who pointed out the Emperor's nakedness. The intellectually naked in contemporary America are threatened by the very idea of anyone speaking truth, and mean to put a stop to it.

As a debatable proposition, the idea that allowing once free people to elect not to do business with a particular someone, whose conduct morally offends them, is somehow a form of persecution of that someone, is ridiculous. It does not become one whit less so, how many spokesmen line up to proclaim its validity.

I had thought that Romney was a better man than one to join in this lunacy.

William Flax

88 posted on 02/26/2014 10:30:21 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

If any of it sounds hard to believe, myself and others can always source it and verify it, rather than just post the description, there isn’t much that we don’t know about Mitt Romney after building files on him for almost a decade here at FR.

The reality of the man is incredible, shocking, it is mind blowing that he not only returned to the GOP, but that by a sympathetic media, and investment of 50 million dollars of his own money at opportune times while building his Republican identity, he managed to become the party’s nominee.


89 posted on 02/26/2014 11:42:29 AM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: castlegreyskull
I do not think Paul Ryan was not the reason that they lost. He was barely a factor. To be honest I think they lost due to massive voter fraud.

Don't you think it could be that Mitt was the most hard left, anti-America candidate the GOP has ever run? That his losing Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin while running pro-choice ads in those three states may have hurt him, or coming out against the GOP's pro-life platform after winning the nomination, and refusing to back off his decades old support for homosexualizing the military and the Boy Scouts?

Romney depressed turn out, but what can you expect from a politician who had only won a single race in his entire career, and that with under 50%, and being such a failure in it that he killed his chance to rerun for the office, and left it with 34% approval.

90 posted on 02/26/2014 11:58:37 AM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Amen


91 posted on 02/26/2014 11:59:38 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dodged a bullet with him losing.


92 posted on 02/26/2014 12:02:11 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
In other words, ya got nothin'!
93 posted on 02/26/2014 12:14:15 PM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster; Patton@Bastogne

I’d love to see the second one! Patton, I hope you’re doing well! Romney is an ever-present threat to the Republican Party and I hope for the day that he is tossed out of the party on his ass — it’s always good to see your posts.


94 posted on 02/26/2014 12:17:01 PM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
As a debatable proposition, the idea that allowing once free people to elect not to do business with a particular someone, whose conduct morally offends them, is somehow a form of persecution of that someone, is ridiculous. It does not become one whit less so, how many spokesmen line up to proclaim its validity.

Exactly. The persecution here is being done BY homosexuals to others, and the only way they can do it is via the forceful backing of the government. Without government, the whole gay "agenda" would be dead in the water.

Reduce government, reduce the problem. This is true of almost every issue in America today -- its moral malaise, its economic malaise, its educational malaise, its energy and food malaise. Reduce government, especially Federal government, in all of those areas to its bare essentials, and watch Americans become ...

...more moral (about two thirds of the states outlawed abortion before Roe v Wade empowered by government overrode their right morality, and obviously most Americans would rather homosexual folks keep their sexually perverse "lifestyle" to themselves and the hell away from their kids) ...

... watch Americans become more prosperous (illegal immigration would shrink and teen employment and right work ethics would thrive if the minimum wage was either axed altogether or minimized to be mostly symbolic) ...

... watch Americans produce more food more cheaply and energy prices drop (current environmental regulation stifles and strangles agricultural production and energy production on the false pretense that free, productive people won't cherish and preserve what they love in nature in their own free ways and in mutual agreement via local government) ...

... and watch many of American public schools become among the world's best as local parents and communities become the overseers of their kids' educations.

Was it Washington who warned that "government is a FORCE and like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master"?

The ANSWER to so much American malaise is in reducing government. About the ONLY major problem I can think of in America that hasn't been fostered and nourished by government, its overwhelmingly liberal mainstream media.

Those folks did it all on their own. So an MSM whose dominant "face" holds a political view that matches maybe a minority 35% of real productive Americans, has conditioned the majority to underestimate its own size and strength. Meanwhile, decade after decade, the Democrat party perfects a vote fraud machine just enough to tip the balance in its favor, and Americans start blaming each other for supporting and electing people and ideas that Americans actually reject almost two to one. That is, productive, involved, active Americans. REAL Americans.

95 posted on 02/26/2014 12:53:28 PM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I think Mitt Romney was a train wreck of a candidate. Not quit as bad as John McCain. Either way, seems like the GOP will keep pushing such candidates, keep up with the losing formula.


96 posted on 02/26/2014 3:11:44 PM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: castlegreyskull

Obviously worse than McCain.

McCain lost a post 2 term Bush election against a black deity, that would have been a minor miracle to win, Romney lost an election against Jimmy Carter’s second term, while we were on the verge of a depression, that the republicans couldn’t lose.


97 posted on 02/26/2014 3:29:35 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

McCain conceded the election before election day, and told everyone that he plans to be just a 1 term president.


98 posted on 02/26/2014 3:32:05 PM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: castlegreyskull

What does that have to do with post 97?

Romney lost an election that couldn’t be lost, he has only held a single office in his 20 year career of running, and he lost that office to a democrat, and left with 34% approval, presidential candidates don’t get worse than Mitt Romney.

You read post 90 and still think the GOP has put up worse candidates?


99 posted on 02/26/2014 4:23:41 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You are really annoying me. Go bother someone else, I will not respond to you again.

Originally, all I said, was that Romney probably will try to run again. I am not championing this possibility. I am saying it would not surprise me. Your posts since, has been extremely combative. I get it, Romney is the devil, he deserves a fate worse than hell. Does this make you happy now? I have said multiple times that I agreed with your statements. However, I have no idea what YOUR statements had to do with my original statement, that Romney will try or consider running again.

To answer your question, you said that McCain was a better candidate than Romney. I stated a couple reasons why I disagreed with that.


100 posted on 02/26/2014 6:06:10 PM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson