We are within striking distance for yellow!
Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!
Make a difference.
PLEASE Contribute Today!
Woo hoo!! And now over less than $450 to the yellow!!
Posted on 02/25/2014 4:56:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
Mitt Romney on Tuesday joined a growing chorus of Republicans urging the Arizona governor to veto a bill that would allow business owners to cite their religious beliefs in refusing service to gay people.
The former Massachusetts governor tweeted at Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R), saying it “is right” to veto the bill passed by the state legislature last week.
Mitt Romney ✔ @MittRomney
.@GovBrewer: veto of #SB1062 is right.
3:41 PM - 25 Feb 2014
1,578 Retweets 831 favorites
Brewer has not said whether she will sign or veto the measure. However, a number of media outlets have reported people close to her expect her to veto it....
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Their anti-capitalist conceit knows no bounds!!! Is Brewer or any conservative pushing for a bill that would punish business owners for serving gay people?
*crickets*
The only bullies here are the Marriott-minded government tyrants. Brewer is about advancing rights. THEY are about removing rights. The entire homosexual agenda is about STEALING individual rights.
I think you misspelled mormon, Jim.
;-)
Me: Please just go away, Mr. Romney. Teach your wife’s horse how to ski or do something less harmful.
“Not one dimes worth of difference.”
Fer sure. Romney would have run guns into Mexico to the narco syndicate, sent Churchill’s statue back to the Brits with a big FU and told our vets to go F themselves.
You’re a genius. Can I get your autograph?
I have a feeling Romney is going to run again.
Romney was a liberal fag. It's the reason he couldn't get anybody to vote for his worthless, dem-lite ass.
Romney lost, it’s time for him to shut up!
I hope she signs the bill!!!
No one should have to cater to queers for any reason!!
I’ll raise at least a million dollars for a conservative challenge.
“What on earth is wrong with the GOP?”
They can be bought, bribed, and blackmailed. It is really tough to find honesty and purity in politicians.
The business owners own the the business and can do as they please!If they can’t it’s not THEIR business!
Yes!
Plus not a surprise that Romney would be on the gay side, he always was
Mitt the twit.
Mitt is THE Rino. McCain and Newt also came out against bill, so did the other Arizona Senator. Ted Cruz is holding strong.
He can't, the biggest hurdle for Romney was convincing the primary voters that his mysterious and unexplained epiphany that he had in 2005, to switch him (and his wife) from being rabidly pro-abortion for his (and her's) entire life, to a sudden pro-life position at age 58 (her's at age 56), just in time to run for president, was a tough sell, Ann was never asked to explain what made her switch at the same time.
After winning the nomination, Romney announced on CBS that he was for abortion in "health of the mother" and was opposed to the pro-life platform of his party, he then ran pro-abortion ads in Ohio, Virginia, and Wisconsin, which probably cost him the election.
Romney will not be able to make yet another switch to pro-life, for yet another run.
Right NOW, today -- as Romney was using the Republican party and banner to extend the same homosexual tyranny, the same environmental tyranny, the same pro-abortion tyranny, the same nationalized health care tyranny, while guns may or may not have continued to be run into Mexico, while the Brits' diplomatic dignity was preserved rather than insulted --
Right now as Romney, defacto head of the Republican party, with the balance of Republicans in Congress leaning almost as far left as himself, began commandeering the Republican party into such a "reach across the aisle" tool to Democrats, would make the few conservatives Republicans virtually devastated as far as any political voice or power. Watch as the "brand" of "Republican" was pissed on and defiled and conservative Republicans increasingly emasculated in the process.
-- what would matter right now? What YOU voted "against" or what YOU voted for?
It took me 35 years to figure it out that voting "against" is what created in the first place a Republican party that nominated a functional statist Democrat for president in 2012. As JRandom Freeper has pointed out: if you vote for liberal Republicans, you're a liberal. Every time I voted for Arnold Schwarzenegger and Meg Whitman, I was in fact a functional liberal, if a philosophical conservative.
Functional is what counts, just like what you vote FOR is the only thing that counts.
“Romney was a liberal fag”
Really? I won’t ask for links to prove that because you can’t.
Pathetic.
Words fail me.
___________________________________________________________
Word’s don’t fail me. Just afraid if I post them...I would be banned from this site.
MR...again, how are you different?
Is it 2016 yet?
Hey Mitt, go F yourself. You have now made it totally obvious to us that you have no balls. Let us hope that the governor of Arizona does have a pair.
Newt, you dope!!! The fast ones are going right over your head! Get a grip!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.