Why Do Democrats Lie?

Obviously, the Susan Rice interview with Lesley Stahl on CBS 60 Minutes December 22, 2013 does not represent true journalism. It does show the astounding level of insouciance that has pervaded the leftist political hemisphere and their lackeys in the liberal news media when they feel they can roll one lie out right after another; not just, mind you little white fibs, but in-your-face, blatant, over-the-top, "go to blazes I'll say what I want to" lies, where truth is merely a manufactured token to be used for the moment and disposed of in the next when it is no longer expedient, where whatever works to sway the public to support whatever liberal cause will be trotted out by the lap-dog news media and not be questioned by their audience.

So what was Susan Rice's response to the tragedy of Benghazi and to those who lost their lives there defending the American Ambassador? Did we see any compunction, any feeling of regret that something more could have been done, should have been done to save their lives? Did Rice express any empathy towards the grieving relatives, did she show any hint of compassion for their loss? Were there any tears of sorrow for these brave men who perished doing their duty to their country?

We saw none. Instead of accountability, instead of humanity, what we saw was an incredibly vulgar performance exhibiting all of the behavior of a psychopath taking the stand, picking her teeth while casually answering questions as to the whereabouts of her criminal gang when the murders occured, totally oblivious to the sobbing of the loved ones out in the audience; behavior marked by a bold defiance of the proprieties and an utter lack of shame; indeed, an incredible exercise in complete inhumanity and shamelessness; which should not surprise us, as this has been the pattern of not only Rice, but of the Clintons, Eric Holder, the Obamas and others of their ilk for years.

We saw this same lack of empathy during Hillary Clinton's temper tantrum before the Congressional committee during the Benghazi hearings. "What difference at this point does it make?" she ranted before a shocked world audience and her senate and congressional peers. It was all about her, defending herself against these mean congressmen who wanted to know why four Americans had lost their lives during her watch. What could she do about it, it wasn't her fault, now it's all over with and let's forget about the whole thing. Such was her child-like, amoral attitude during the hearings, and such has been the attitude of the media while they try to cleanse Clinton's bloody record in the aftermath.

"Let them eat cake" Rice told the surviving relatives of the Benghazi Four while she sat in smug arrogance during the Stahl interview. She knew she had nothing to fear from Leslie Stahl or 60 Minutes. She knew they would not press her for details, question her about brazenly misrepresenting the truth. She was in her element, she was surrounded by her court admirers. This was not an interview, Rice was holding a sitting, she was having an old fashioned parlor salon chat with a friend. Leslie Stahl was not interviewing Susan Rice; Susan Rice was receiving Leslie Stahl, Stahl was merely a lady in waiting, a handmaid brought in for this charade for the public consumption; truth, justice, equity, righteousness, they had nothing to do with this execrable "interview".

It was no mistake, no coincidence that this interview occurred when it did, just a week before the so-called "revelation" by two New York Times reporters that, in spite of all of the evidence, in spite of what intelligence officers said, in spite of what the Interim President of Lybia had said (see above article), of what survivors of the attack said, in spite of videos and sound recordings of the event, in spite of Egyptian intelligence reports saying that Al Quada was involved, the lie that Rice said on 60 Minutes was further regurgitated by these lackeys.

This is no accident, this did not happen by randomness; this is simply part of a concerted campaign by the left to paper over the mess of Benghazi in order to pave the way for Hillary to make the Presidential run in 2016. There were meetings, there were closed door discussions, strategy and tactics were involved in this cleverly timed roll out of these two events. The media is in collusion with the scoundrels who have been running this country for the past six years, and with the scoundrels who ran it back in the 90's. The media are their water boys, they provide cover for this inept, corrupt, criminal Obama administration, and with their former tight hold of the reigns of power over the information market place, they believe that they can get away with just about anything their corrupt, little hearts desire.

They do have one problem though. Just as the printing press led to a liberation in human thought and life, so the internet has led to a revolution in truth, albeit along with the "tares", and the stronghold that CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR and others have had over shaping our world view to their plans has been broken. There are finally alternatives to the democratic oligarchy that has dominated our public square since the time of Walter Cronkite, the man who stabbed American armed forces in the back during the TET offensive in Vietnam, when we actually had a chance of winning the war, except for his lie to the American public at that time, a lie that shaped history and led to the eventual defeat of American forces and to the communist takeover of that nation, and indirectly to the communist massacre in Laos and Cambodia under Pol Pot.

Cronkite's sin was and is Hillary's sin, it is Eric Holder's sin when he sold weapons to mexican drug lords, Lois Lerner's sin when she persecuted conservative organizations through the IRS, it is Bill Clinton's sin when he sold missile technology to China in exchange for illegal campaign donations, it is the sin of the one who betrayed Christ for a paltry sum of money, for worldly gain, it is the sin of all of the Judas's down through history who have betrayed their fellow countrymen for power.

Yes, and this is Susan Rice's sin, and shame on us if we swallow her lies, and lie down in dumb acquiescence under the jack booted feet of this liberal tyranny, and this most corrupt administration in America's history. God bless, God save America.

Unlike JFK, today's Democrat has no moral compass

JFK had a moral compass? Did you even read the article? Clean up your language!

"But, really, what could be more heavenly than JFK's life on earth? He knew the press would never report his deflowering of a 19-year-old virgin on her fourth day on the job. He was free to ravish intern Mimi Alford in the First Lady's bedroom, entertain her with rubber duckies in the bathtub, ply her with recreational drugs, and coax her into bestowing sexual favors on little brother Ted. And those naked White House pool parties! The "steady stream" of high-class prostitutes! What in heaven can beat that?"

Cordially,

65 posted on 01/02/2014 6:15:23 AM PST by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)

Point taken, but at least JFK managed to maintain an air of decency and love for America. What happened behind closed doors eventually came out, but you got the sense he BELIEVED IN and LOVED America, no?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.