Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

#IstandWithPhilRobertson
1 posted on 12/25/2013 12:17:15 AM PST by NetAddicted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NetAddicted

Oops! Keep having problems posting. Figure it’s to do with iPads, but the article was titled Faith, not Religion.


2 posted on 12/25/2013 12:20:12 AM PST by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted
1. Sarah Palin isn't a politician.

2. Nothing Phil said was offensive unless you believe the word of God is offensive.

3 posted on 12/25/2013 1:06:05 AM PST by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted
I won’t repeat Robertson’s remarks because they are offensive.

But the activity he was commenting on, isn't?

4 posted on 12/25/2013 1:11:12 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted
"I won’t repeat Robertson’s remarks because they are offensive."

Robertson's remarks were only "offensive" in that the language he used was slightly coarse. But the disgusting activity he was describing cannot be described in any other way than offensively-- unless you don't mention it at all, which is what "gays" and their supporters count on. And the fact remains that he didn't say anything that wasn't true or wasn't his own stated opinion based on his experience. To people who object to what he replied when he was asked a straightforward question, I would ask them two questions:

1. What exactly did he say that wasn't true?

2. If you don't like the way he characterized homosexual sex, how would YOU describe it?

6 posted on 12/25/2013 1:43:11 AM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted
I won’t repeat Robertson’s remarks because they are offensive."

Words and opinions are not inherently offensive. Some people CHOOSE to be offended, or not.

7 posted on 12/25/2013 1:52:50 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted

I won’t repeat Robertson’s remarks because they are offensive.

Then you really have no clue what this is about. Nothing Robertson said was offensive, beyond the fact that it was a truth that a certain militant minority objects to..
Ther are many truths I personally disagree with but to call them all offensive would be childish...


9 posted on 12/25/2013 3:19:24 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I go to sign up for the American Revolution 2013 and the Crusades 2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted

I won’t repeat Robertson’s remarks because they are offensive.

.........................................................
They were offensive to those sinners he was speaking of,

To others the remarks were only the truth.


10 posted on 12/25/2013 4:39:06 AM PST by Venturer (Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted
Never forget that slaveholder senator John C. Calhoun once said that having a Constitutional guaranty of owning slaves wasn't enough, that you had to have a protection against any CRITICISM of slavery---to be able to own them "in security" I think was his phrase.

This is exactly what the homosexuals want---not just to legally practice homosexuality but to be free from criticism of their homosexuality.

13 posted on 12/25/2013 5:50:00 AM PST by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted
I'm loving this!

A few days ago, HuffPo Religion posted their take on the Daily Mail article from the weekend - it was really skewed.

So, I get on their forum to set the record straight (pun intended),

By last night, they moved the article to their Gay Voices forum - victory!

16 posted on 12/25/2013 6:37:07 AM PST by DaveMSmith (Evil Comes from Falsity, So Share the Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted

So do I.


17 posted on 12/25/2013 6:41:50 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted

Right off the bat she calls the Bible offensive.


20 posted on 12/25/2013 7:11:11 AM PST by Old_And_Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted

I notice that the Muslims don’t put up with homosexuality. As Pat Buchanan has pointed out, “in the four dozen nations that are predominantly Muslim, same-sex marriage is not even on the table.”


26 posted on 12/25/2013 8:39:59 AM PST by paristexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted

Funny how the liberal set is tying itself up in self contradiction at whatever level it tries to talk about the matter!

Could it be this is how God is going to bring this nonsense down in confusion? And these rednecks are just going to be standing here grinning at it.


28 posted on 12/25/2013 8:44:25 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NetAddicted

Says won’t repeat his words because they are offensive. The Bible makes it clear that to those that are lost and dying that the words of the Bible are an offense. Thus, this person is a non-believer who rejects the words of the Bible, which is what the guy was quoting. He simply quoted scripture.


37 posted on 12/25/2013 10:33:54 AM PST by RetiredArmy (I am proud to be a Christian and follower of my Lord Jesus Christ. Time is short for U to know Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson