[Q-ManRN]

Once again, we see that "universal" background checks cannot cover violent criminals that obtain their firearms illegally. Yet, the myth of universal background checks that will stop violent criminals lives on in the fantasies of liberals.

[Personal Responsibility]

The Left would respond to this by saying if no one had a gun this could have been averted. That’s their “logic”

[R_Kangel]

"Sandy Hook Report: Adam Lanza Broke Laws to Acquire Guns, Broke More Laws Using Them..."

..... Well then it's obvious that they need to pass a law making breaking the previous laws illegal .... er something :-\

[Antihero101607]

He broke several laws, but, but, we have LAWS for this sort of thing.

[Q-ManRN]

The fallacy of “universal” background checks exposed again in the Connecticut Attorney General’s report on the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Manchin's argument would be that if nobody was allowed to own guns, there would be no guns to steal.

[SamuraiScot]

He broke laws that shouldn’t even be on the books. But that’s not the point. The point is that he was an obvious psycho who in an earlier time (40 years ago) wouldn’t have been running around loose.

[maddog55]

[silverleaf]

Obviously we need more laws against breaking laws

unless you are congress or the president, of course

[Gargantua]

Given all the existing Laws this dirtbag broke, I'd like it if just one grandstanding rump-suck legislator would explain to us what they feel they'll actually accomplish by passing more Laws?

Since the perpetrator has already displayed a refusal to obey The Law, it's clear that passing more Laws will only affect the behavior of those currently respecting the Laws already on The Books. New Laws will have absolutely no effect on curbing the mass murderering scofflaws yet to slap leather.

Don't you just loathe the grandstanding rump-sucks? I know I do...

;-\

[The Great RJ]

Ironic that after the Sandy Hook shooting and the young thugs shooting of an Australian college student in Oklahoma, there were cries for more gun control, yet those same liberal sob sisters didn’t say anything about banning the flashlights used by street punks to beat a WW-II veteran to death in Spokane or the box cutter used by a 14 year old fiend to murder a 23 year old high school teacher in Massachusetts.

[TurkeyLurkey]

Having a child in his mental condition and exposing him to those guns (any gun) is pure-dee stupid, and his mother is partly responsible for the deaths of those children and teachers.

[poobear]

Of course not. They don’t want anyone to own guns. “PERIOD”

[Pearls Before Swine]

Adam Lanza Broke Laws to Acquire Guns, Broke More Laws Using Them

Then it stands to reason that if we have more laws, it would be harder for people like Adam to break them all. /S