What really kills me is the rational for the dissenting opinion.
“... that the action ‘seriously disrupts’ the status quo,” and that “By putting Texas’ new law into immediate effect, it instantly leaves 24 counties in the Rio Grande Valley with no abortion provider,” he said, adding that “it may substantially reduce access to safe abortions elsewhere in Texas.”
There is NO Constitutional basis for their argument at all. It’s like we have four judges who’ve forgotten their basic job description.
How about no gun shops in Chicago,DC etc. Any constitutional problem there?