Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court vote upholds Texas abortion law
Los Angeles Times ^ | November 19, 2013, 7:20 p.m. | David G. Savage

Posted on 11/19/2013 8:13:25 PM PST by Olog-hai

The Supreme Court cleared the way Tuesday for Texas to enforce a strict new abortion regulation that opponents say prevents a third of the state's clinics from performing the procedure.

The court, in a 5-4 vote, split along ideological lines in turning down an appeal to block the law that abortion rights advocates challenged as unconstitutional.

The measure, adopted by Texas lawmakers in July, requires that abortion providers have a doctor on their staffs who has admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the clinic.

By rejecting the request, the justices signaled they do not think the Texas law puts an unconstitutional barrier before women seeking an abortion. The Planned Parenthood Federation said the law had forced 12 of the state’s 36 licensed abortion providers to stop offering abortions. …

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionbarbie; restrictions; scotus

1 posted on 11/19/2013 8:13:26 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Pro-lifers learned from Dems how to fight.

If you cant outlaw it then regulate it to death

Like cigarettes.


2 posted on 11/19/2013 8:27:19 PM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I remember during Clinton,s reign he’d closed 100,000’s of gun dealers by requiring stores and other regulations. A lot of people had legal FFL’s and were called “ kitchen table gun dealers” and shut down. But, Liberals thought that was a grand idea and a tightening of regulation. What is good for the goose etc.


3 posted on 11/19/2013 8:28:08 PM PST by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

PRAISE GOD!


4 posted on 11/20/2013 3:50:54 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What really kills me is the rational for the dissenting opinion.

“... that the action ‘seriously disrupts’ the status quo,” and that “By putting Texas’ new law into immediate effect, it instantly leaves 24 counties in the Rio Grande Valley with no abortion provider,” he said, adding that “it may substantially reduce access to safe abortions elsewhere in Texas.”

There is NO Constitutional basis for their argument at all. It’s like we have four judges who’ve forgotten their basic job description.


5 posted on 11/20/2013 4:48:02 AM PST by Marie (When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

How about no gun shops in Chicago,DC etc. Any constitutional problem there?


6 posted on 11/20/2013 6:14:16 AM PST by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson