Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

History Will Judge Obama on Actions, Not Words
Townhall.com ^ | November 6, 2013 | Rachel Marsden

Posted on 11/06/2013 2:58:43 PM PST by Kaslin

History judges a leader exclusively through his actions and their ultimate results rather than through fleeting words. It appears that U.S. President Barack Obama is finally putting the brakes on his mouth after flooring it down Hope-and-Change Highway for most of his tenure.

Remember the Syrian crisis that dominated chatter for months before all but vanishing? Recall how critics were talking about grievous incompetence and even possible impeachment? Fast-forward to today, and just try to start a conversation with, "Obama really botched the situation in Syria." Now that the Russians have overseen a plan for the destruction of that country's chemical arsenal and reeled in its leader, to what "botched" Syria situation would this even refer?

History records plane crashes, not turbulence -- although those on the flight itself might chatter about it. And therein lies the problem: the increasing disconnect between reality and the virtual world as people become more engrossed with social media and its real-time nature. Far too many observers are obsessed with second-by-second minutiae and the slightest twitches. The leader of a nation isn't tethered by social media or news feeds, nor should he be. In fact, that would make him unfit for leadership.

As a leader, you set the narrative, and that means not responding to people with their own agendas -- much like football players don't spend the game yelling into the stands at the fans of the opposing team. Arguably no recent American president understood this better than George W. Bush. It could be that Obama is now starting to get it, too.

Whether one agrees with him or not, Obama has been working to push through major reforms in areas ranging from health care to immigration to gun-control legislation. For all of its flaws, Obamacare is the most ambitious social safety net to be introduced in America in decades. A dramatic overhaul of immigration laws is likely to follow.

Presidents have a tactical decision to make: Either they can keep talking and painstakingly explaining their choices (as former U.S. President Bill Clinton was famous for doing throughout the turbulence of his mandate), or they can rhetorically retreat and let actions and outcomes speak for themselves. Bush was a fan of the action-over-rhetoric strategy, having all but eliminated any defensive communications efforts and preferring to let history write itself.

"Caution: Subjects are less prominent than they appear." That tagline should be attached to information that emerges from the tireless 24/7 news and information onslaught. In the moment, anything and everything can seem important, but only time can properly contextualize it. Polls are taken every few days. Only the latest one counts, and there's always another one coming right up.

When faced with a crisis, a smart leader asks himself: "Will history ascribe importance to this event? If so, what will be the greater context?" It is precisely with those questions in mind that a politician should speak -- or not. It's a mark of wisdom rather than arrogance not to be goaded into responding to things that don't meet these criteria for response. A leader, after all, is elected to lead, not to have his chain yanked by anyone who gives it a tug.

History doesn't have to be decided today, and it certainly won't be decided by self-appointed gatekeepers. The smart leader understands that no one comes home from a vacation and focuses on the five minutes of turbulence during return flight. For all the flack Bush received for his aggressive foreign-policy moves in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks, a June 2013 Gallup poll showed that his domestic approval rating had climbed to 49 percent after bottoming out at 32 percent in the last year of his final term. What did he do to earn such a substantial bump in popularity? Nothing that he wasn't criticized for during his presidency.

French presidents, from Jacques Chirac to Nicolas Sarkozy, are consistently more popular in the rearview mirror, after the dust has settled and the scope of their accomplishments becomes clearer.

Facts and truth don't need hand-holding. They find their way into history all by themselves.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: abortion; benghazi; blackkk; deathpanels; fastandfurious; florida; georgezimmerman; history; impeachnow; irs; lamestreammedia; leadership; obamacare; resident0bama; trayvonmartin; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Kaslin
Now that the Russians have overseen a plan for the destruction of that country's chemical arsenal and reeled in its leader, to what "botched" Syria situation would this even refer?

This is an incredible statement, but representative of the overall tone, which describes Obama careening from one disaster to another, but always surviving. What a man! What a President! ... Is Egypt still out there someplace? I don't remember.

21 posted on 11/06/2013 3:25:43 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

Not really.


22 posted on 11/06/2013 3:27:25 PM PST by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It will be a harsh judgement.


23 posted on 11/06/2013 3:27:58 PM PST by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama is already accelerating toward full Hitler.

What history will judge is the maggotry that didn’t hang him.


24 posted on 11/06/2013 3:28:57 PM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We will recognize his lack of deficit spending. After all in order to calculate a deficit you must compare spending to budgeted spending. His Congress has never passed a budget ergo no deficits!


25 posted on 11/06/2013 3:40:34 PM PST by Young Werther (Julius Caesar said "Quae cum ita sunt. Since these things are so.".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Depends on which version of history survives the coming dark times.


26 posted on 11/06/2013 3:42:25 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
When the Obama saga is written; may history also judge the democrat party and its media.

On that topic I'm concerned that the Wiki page on Obama will read:

Barack Hussein Obama II (i/bəˈrɑːk huːˈseɪn oʊˈbɑːmə/; born August 4, 1961) was the 44th and last President of the United States.

27 posted on 11/06/2013 3:45:07 PM PST by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; GeronL

What did Teddy Roosevelt famously do?

He said “Talk softly but carry a big stick.”

Words are remembered.

“Tear down this wall.”

“Four score and seven years ago.”

“(I am) not a crook.”

“Read my lips, no new taxes.”


28 posted on 11/06/2013 3:47:06 PM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What do Russian history books say about Lenin and Stalin?


29 posted on 11/06/2013 3:51:23 PM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

You got that right. I lost my faith in history’s judgment watching Bill Clinton become generally recognized as a beloved statesman who was the most successful president since Reagan.

History can go screw.

Alex Haley was right. History is written by the victors, and so far, it looks like the totalitarian leftists are the victors.


30 posted on 11/06/2013 3:53:41 PM PST by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Yep. he’s the Lord of the Lies for sure...he’s expert, certified grade A at that skill...


31 posted on 11/06/2013 3:59:00 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
And the judgement of that future history will be determined by the ethos that prevails in the dominant culture at that time.

If the dominant culture follows the trend of recent decades then Obama will be lionized in history.

32 posted on 11/06/2013 7:19:34 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Expel the Occupy White House squatters !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
Nice rant.

.....we have like 10 or fewer people actually trying to lead at a national level.... and radio hosts Levin, Rush and a handful more. That’s it.....

We only need ONE leader to make a difference---when Reagan surfaced, he was summarily written off---"couldn't possibly win," they said. Today, he is the man who is viewed as the paradigm political leader.

33 posted on 11/07/2013 3:28:18 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson