Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hospitals refusing to accept Obamacare patients
Small Government Times ^ | 2013-11-04 | Steve Adcock

Posted on 11/04/2013 9:08:33 AM PST by sdnet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: sdnet
More and more hospitals are beginning to refuse heavily used and risky Obamacare plans that were purchased within the healthcare “marketplace” due to fears that policyholders simply cannot afford expensive medical services.

Hospitals have figured out working class families won't be able to pay their $12,000 annual deductible? Stunning. One sick child and most working class families will lose everything. Of course Obama's most dependent - oops - most dependable voters will be totally covered.

21 posted on 11/04/2013 10:25:06 AM PST by GOPJ (Show me just ONE example of an Islamic country where non Muslims are treated with equality.TimLee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
There'll be all kinds of voter support for that. /s

November 6, 2012. I rest my case.

22 posted on 11/04/2013 10:28:27 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

This means the democrats are going to push for a COMPLETE takeover of medical care (why do you think they call this the patient CARE act?).
They don’t want doctors to choose their patients, or patients to choose their doctors.
Under commiecare, you go to the doctor that they assign you or die.
(Except for the ruling elite - they have access to the finest, most expensive doctors, paid for by you and me.)


23 posted on 11/04/2013 10:51:24 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

Almost all of the “Obamacare” signups so far actually have been new Medicaid enrollments. Those people will find very limited options.


24 posted on 11/04/2013 11:25:44 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

We were expecting this $h!t, but I hope a righteous sense of betrayal and wrath sends Democrats into the streets of Washington with pitchforks. They deserve everything that is coming to them, and more.


25 posted on 11/04/2013 11:50:27 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
“emergency” is defined in the law so broadly that it allows deadbeats to use the ER as a 24/7/365 walk-in clinic...

That isn't true. Just the opposite is true. When the hospital provides the type of non-emergent care you describe it is discretionary. EMTALA definition:

An emergency medical condition is defined as "a condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity (including severe pain) such that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result in placing the individual's health [or the health of an unborn child] in serious jeopardy, serious impairment to bodily functions, or serious dysfunction of bodily organs." For example, a pregnant woman with an emergency condition must be treated until delivery is complete, unless a transfer under the statute is appropriate.[9] --wiki

26 posted on 11/04/2013 12:01:29 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Almost all of the “Obamacare” signups so far actually have been new Medicaid enrollments.

That isn't true either, unless you count only those commercial enrollments with the January premium already paid (why would anyone pay before the bill is due?). For example, Washington State has over 60,000 qualified enrollments not paid yet.

The level of disinformation round here is getting as bad as DU or KOS but in the opposite direction.

27 posted on 11/04/2013 12:06:06 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: steve86

I guess you know better than the head of the Colorado exchange.


28 posted on 11/04/2013 1:11:50 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: steve86
That isn't true. Just the opposite is true. When the hospital provides the type of non-emergent care you describe it is discretionary.

I spent 20 years in hospital administration...specifically *ER* administration...at one of the world's finest hospital's.I've never been a lawyer and never will be but I do know this:our hospital's policy was that *anyone* who presented at the ER,regardless of time of day,severity of their chief complaint or ability to pay *were* to be treated.On several occasions there were complaints by patients that they had been denied treatment in our ER and on each such occasion we (physicians,nurses and administrators) would get a memo from the *legal department* confirming the established policy...*everyone* gets treated.Not being a lawyer I always assumed that this was connected to "Hill-Burton".

I've been out of the health care biz for some time and the law could very well have changed since I left.It's also possible that I mistook hospital policy,as periodically confirmed by our legal department,for Federal law.Another possibility,it would seem,is that it was *Massachusetts* law that we were following.

I'm no expert on *anything* in this life but I do have a fair amount of experience in helping to manage a Massachusetts hospital's ER.

29 posted on 11/04/2013 3:59:44 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
But But BUT

It’s the law of the land.

And a flawed law, at that.

Flaw of the land?

30 posted on 11/04/2013 4:05:28 PM PST by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
November 6, 2012. I rest my case.

Ah, but you're leaving out one important part of the equation, and that's the pain that Obamacare is bringing home to most Americans.

Obama flat out lied to us and his constituents. Now we, and they, are finding out that you can't "keep your plan if you like it", and that the cost to maintain the type of coverage you had, is going through the roof.

At the risk of repeating myself, I'll say again...people who've been responsible enough to work for a living and pay for their health care privately, or through their employer, are not going to be happy with the level of care that the poor receive from Medicaid. Especially when millions upon millions more people are squeezed into the same government run system.

Memories may be short when it comes to flaps and scandals in government, but people aren't likely to soon forget the quality of health care they just recently enjoyed. They're going to object to the quality being reduced, while the price goes up. Someone's going to pay a political price for inflicting that pain, and it won't be the Republicans who wisely kept their fingerprints off the whole thing.

31 posted on 11/04/2013 7:43:52 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Think it through carefully: those having their policies cancelled now are mainly people buying their own health insurance. Not union hacks, not government employees, not rich entertainers and not professional parasites already getting everything for free.

IOW, not the friends of Obama. They are mostly his enemies who didn't vote for him anyway. I hope to hell I'm wrong. I'd love to be proven wrong. I would rejoice at being proven wrong. But my gut feeling is still that we reached the tipping point on November 5, 2012. The offering of a moderate squish was the equivalent of Lot offering his virgin daughters to the people of Sodom in exchange for leaving the holy men visiting his household alone. And the people of Sodom said no.

32 posted on 11/05/2013 5:46:51 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Those hospitals know those high deductibles will have to be met first. People signing up do not have that kind of cash.

I hear many doctors and hospitals want the deductible met before treating people.


33 posted on 11/05/2013 5:50:16 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
those having their policies cancelled now are mainly people buying their own health insurance. Not union hacks, not government employees, not rich entertainers and not professional parasites already getting everything for free.

Yeah, people like my liberal, Democrat voting siblings, who all work for a living, own homes, have 401Ks, pay for their kid's college, pay taxes -- and pay for their own health insurance.

Today, my kin are the only libs I know, but there was a time when nearly every friend I had was a lib. We all worked. We all paid taxes. Some were college educated. All were professionals in their work. Not a one of us was on any sort of government welfare program.

The point I'm making, is that there's a large class of self reliant people out there who pay their own way in life, yet still vote for Commies. Those people are getting hurt by Obamacare as badly as any self reliant person on the right.

34 posted on 11/05/2013 7:46:03 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
All I can say is that I hope your right and I hope there is enough of them to make a difference. We shall see.

Not that I'm giving up against the onslaught of the left. No way, no how, not now, not ever. Just that I no longer put much hope is rigged and sham elections.

35 posted on 11/05/2013 8:39:09 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson