Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/07/2013 3:31:16 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Where does the control freak majority come form? The liberals comprise 20% of the population with conservatives at 40%. This article does not make sense and what does a policeman waiting outside a bar have to do with anything.


2 posted on 10/07/2013 3:36:16 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Sage advice for the budding revolutionary is “pick your battles carefully.”


3 posted on 10/07/2013 3:36:32 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
This minority of free-thinking and free-acting people have effectively chosen to be our "designated decoys." We owe them our thanks—and we need a lot more like them.

You're welcome!

;-)

4 posted on 10/07/2013 3:40:53 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Need health care? Dial 1-800-F1UCK-YO to reach Obama's hotline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
In my PA municipality, the Board of Supervisors have taken the view (and even stated it) that all those annoying ordinances are just ‘tools’ to be used to solve problems - anyone who comes to government with a complaint about their neighbor (or anyone else in the municipality) deserves to have a resolution to their complaints. I even heard them say, in a public hearing, that yes, it would be very costly to enforce the proposed ordinance on every corner of the municipality, but they don't intend to use it that way, just as a tool when there are complaints.

No one ever takes these proposals and uses an analogy to demonstrate the absurdity of legislating personal preference. Well, almost no one - I have! On the issue of what would be appropriate exterior coverings in a proposed zoning overlay, I asked what they would do if they found that most people preferred bright colors (like purple) to ‘muted earth tones’? Would they change the ordinance to require the latest trendy hues? What if there was a big dispute between the bright color lovers and the muted earth-tone fans - at that point would they agree that they shouldn't be legislating something that is truly a matter of personal taste?

While I won that particular battle, a few years later they slipped their earth-tone preferences into a different ordinance, so that THEIR personal preferences would be the law... Hard to believe they took an oath of office!

9 posted on 10/07/2013 4:46:33 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Government actions ALWAYS have unintended consequences...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This is an achilles heel for our side.

All too often, conservatives won’t jaywalk to avoid a burning building, because that would be breaking THE RULES!


13 posted on 10/07/2013 5:02:52 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Power disintegrates when people withdraw their obedience and support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson