Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MileHi

Zimmerman, in his demonstration, showed that his holster was in the small of his back behind his right hip. And if he had a free hand to reach for his gun, why didn’t he use that hand to fight off his “attacker”? I don’t believe anything he’s said. Martin wasn’t doing anything wrong, and Zimmerman, by his own admission, didn’t identify himself as a block-watch guy - if Martin thought he was about to mugged, why not fight? The irony here is that if Martin had killed Zimmerman, he would have had an excellent case of “stand your ground”.


25 posted on 07/08/2013 7:25:43 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: stormer
I don’t believe anything he’s said.

That is your choice. But all can see that you spin a very dishonest account of events.

I DO believe Zimmerman, he has been very credible. You, not so much.

32 posted on 07/08/2013 7:31:39 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: stormer

>> if he had a free hand to reach for his gun, why didn’t he use that hand to fight off his “attacker”?

Hmmm... someone is attacking you, in a manner that causes you to fear that he intends to take your life.

You decide you must defend yourself, and you have two weapons at your disposal — in Z’s case, a fist and a gun.

I was not aware that there is anything in self defense law that specifies which of your available weapons you may use to defend yourself, and which you may not use. In other words, I don’t think you’re obligated to calculate just how *little* force you must apply to succeed. Can you find me a reference?

(And that leaves aside the whole question of whether or not Z’s fist *would have been* adequate defense. Actually, the defense effectively argued, using witnesses, that Z was probably not capable of fighting off St. Trayvon with his hands.)


34 posted on 07/08/2013 7:39:12 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: stormer

hogwash.

Martin was using the concrete as a weapon.

Martin was the one with premeditation by comming back from his house. The cell phone positioning shows zimmerman was not following any more.


39 posted on 07/08/2013 7:44:57 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: stormer

Did you fall and hit your head recently?


44 posted on 07/08/2013 7:53:37 PM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: stormer
I don’t believe anything he’s said. Martin wasn’t doing anything wrong, and Zimmerman, by his own admission, didn’t identify himself as a block-watch guy - if Martin thought he was about to mugged, why not fight? The irony here is that if Martin had killed Zimmerman, he would have had an excellent case of “stand your ground”.

LOL! Thank God we have a low-information voter on a Zimmerman thread finally.

If you don't believe anything the white-Hispanic has said than any animation by the defense should help bolster the State, right?

I'd love to see what the State would come up with as an animation. It *would* be cartoonish.

55 posted on 07/08/2013 8:39:08 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Obama's Enemies List - Yes, you are a crook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: stormer

You aren’t following the case at all are you?


60 posted on 07/08/2013 9:37:59 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: stormer

“I don’t believe anything he’s said”

I don’t care what you believe.


72 posted on 07/09/2013 8:28:10 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson