Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

Well the Jackson situation was different. They wanted the vicarious fame of the kids rubbing elbows (though it appeared to be more than elbows by the time this thing was through) with Jackson.

Come to think of it, maybe BSA is similar. Parents want the prestige.


74 posted on 05/27/2013 10:00:53 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Not much different. Their kid gets molested and they sue the life out of the BSA. You’d think if they loved their kid they would not put their kid in the BSA or Michael Jackson’s home in the first place!


81 posted on 05/27/2013 10:06:36 AM PDT by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

On second thought maybe different. The parents could not spend the night with their kid in Michael Jackson’s home. However if you put your kid in the BSA now then I suggest you join too and be with your kid every second and that includes all outings!! Never let your kid alone for one minute esp when he goes to the toilet. Also know who all the queer kids are like it is a sex offender registry.


86 posted on 05/27/2013 10:09:07 AM PDT by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson